Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
US bans foreign routers - reason enough for a new Airport?
- Thread starter Reverend Benny
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
FCC Ramps Up Its Drone Ban, Targets 9 Companies Making DJI Clones. Here's Who Will Feel It Most by Jim Fisher (PC Magazine).
Perhaps only tangentially-related to the thread topic, but still relevant. The FCC is now revoking prior approval from some products. From the article:
"It's a big move; not only is it the first time that the FCC has leveraged its ability to pull approval from products it had previously vetted as safe to use, but it's also another escalation in the ongoing battle between the federal government and China's most successful camera brand. Skyrover and Xtra won't disappear from US stores immediately; the FCC's rules require a 30-day waiting period for public comment. But assuming an outcry doesn't change the agency's decision, previously approved DJI clones will land on the Covered List in mid-August."
bogdanw
macrumors G3
"Trump admin exempts SpaceX’s Starlink from FCC ban on foreign-made routers
Starlink has a Texas factory but also makes routers in Vietnam."
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...-from-fcc-ban-on-routers-made-outside-the-us/
Starlink has a Texas factory but also makes routers in Vietnam."
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...-from-fcc-ban-on-routers-made-outside-the-us/
As we watchfully await further developments regarding banning routers and related issues, the mindset, practicality and 'common sense' of the FCC is obviously a factor that may impact these decisions going forward. Particularly if one puts faith in the idea 'Oh, come on, they wouldn't do that, they wouldn't go that far...' on some issue.
Seeing that this thread is not in the Political News section, there are constraints on the allowed discussion. For those of you interested to gain information to inform your private opinions on these matters, whatever conclusions you may come to, from PC Magazine today:
The FCC Moves to Retroactively Ban Drones With LiDAR Obstacle Avoidance Many photographers and videographers will be surprised to learn that the FCC considers camera drones with LiDAR obstacle avoidance, like the consumer-grade Air 3S, Avata 360, and Mini 5 Pro, to be weapons of war.
From the article:
"There's a twist, though: the FCC's definition of "military grade" is broad enough to cover any drone with LiDAR sensors."
"Several of DJI's consumer drones use LiDAR for obstacle detection and avoidance, including two PCMag Editors' Choice winners: the Air 3S, our top-rated camera drone, and the Avata 360, the best drone for spherical imaging. The Mini 5 Pro, which we missed reviewing, also uses LiDAR. All three of these drones received FCC clearance before DJI was added to the FCC Covered List in late 2025."
"If you already own and use one of these models, you won't be affected, but if the FCC doesn't change its mind by the time the public comment period ends on Sept. 2, all three would disappear from retail in the US."
"The FCC also considers any drone with a thermal camera to be military-grade, so the DJI Mavic 3 T, which is used for industrial inspections and by first responders for search-and-rescue operations, would get the kibosh. Drones that are able to plant seeds and spray pesticides are also on the chopping block, which hits the DJI Agras drones used by farmers, as well as similar hardware from other manufacturers that's made outside the US."
At least it doesn't sound finalized quite yet.
This is the same FCC wielding great power and actively regulating the consumer router market.
Draw what conclusions you will.
Seeing that this thread is not in the Political News section, there are constraints on the allowed discussion. For those of you interested to gain information to inform your private opinions on these matters, whatever conclusions you may come to, from PC Magazine today:
The FCC Moves to Retroactively Ban Drones With LiDAR Obstacle Avoidance Many photographers and videographers will be surprised to learn that the FCC considers camera drones with LiDAR obstacle avoidance, like the consumer-grade Air 3S, Avata 360, and Mini 5 Pro, to be weapons of war.
From the article:
"There's a twist, though: the FCC's definition of "military grade" is broad enough to cover any drone with LiDAR sensors."
"Several of DJI's consumer drones use LiDAR for obstacle detection and avoidance, including two PCMag Editors' Choice winners: the Air 3S, our top-rated camera drone, and the Avata 360, the best drone for spherical imaging. The Mini 5 Pro, which we missed reviewing, also uses LiDAR. All three of these drones received FCC clearance before DJI was added to the FCC Covered List in late 2025."
"If you already own and use one of these models, you won't be affected, but if the FCC doesn't change its mind by the time the public comment period ends on Sept. 2, all three would disappear from retail in the US."
"The FCC also considers any drone with a thermal camera to be military-grade, so the DJI Mavic 3 T, which is used for industrial inspections and by first responders for search-and-rescue operations, would get the kibosh. Drones that are able to plant seeds and spray pesticides are also on the chopping block, which hits the DJI Agras drones used by farmers, as well as similar hardware from other manufacturers that's made outside the US."
At least it doesn't sound finalized quite yet.
This is the same FCC wielding great power and actively regulating the consumer router market.
Draw what conclusions you will.
Archaeology now makes extensive use of drones with LiDAR and multispectral sensors. That too would be affected.
Maybe we will see new approaches which sidestep new regulations - at least for a while. For example, using a drone which does not itself have LiDAR to drop an uncontrolled parachuted device (so it is NOT a drone) which does have LiDAR. And doing the best you can with multiple drops and exploiting any wind to achieve the best coverage.
From PC Magazine Aug. 14, 2026Take It From a Licensed Drone Pilot: The FCC’s Expanding Ban Is Out of Control Drones were just the canary in the coal mine. Washington's crusade against foreign tech is about to make the gadgets you rely on outrageously expensive—or impossible to buy. Jim Fisher Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras.
From the article:
"At present, the US is in what I think is best described as a cold economic war with China, and drones are one of its victims. In the past few years alone, the US has levied tariffs on its exports, restricted what tech the country is allowed to import, and now the FCC is banning its technological exports willy-nilly. In recent months, the FCC has gone after everything from robot vacuums to internet routers to portable power stations."
While this thread is not in Political News, if Fisher's belief is correct, it has implications for how regulation may proceed going forward, including for consumer routers (relevant to this thread).
"American drone companies aren't delivering equipment for consumers; they're all about industry, agriculture, and public safety, markets that are far less price-sensitive than gig workers trying to pay their rent by..."
"Simply put, there are no good camera drones made in the US. When I spoke to Arthur Erickson, the CEO of US agricultural drone firm Hylio, earlier this year, he told me that the US was one to three years away from making a drone that could compete with DJI's latest 249g flagship, the Mini 5 Pro, and that it would likely cost $4,000 to $5,000 at retail, more than five times the cost of the DJI model."
"Its public notice seeks to ban the sale and import of all foreign drones with LiDAR obstacle sensors, thermal cameras, ..."
"Several consumer drones use LiDAR to intelligently avoid obstacles and crashes—LiDAR makes a drone safer to fly in crowded environments. The entry-level DJI Neo 2, midrange Mini 5 Pro, and pro-grade Air 3S all use it. Thermal cameras are crucial for first responders performing search and rescue and for inspectors looking for heat leaks around a home or an industrial site."
The article is worth a read, and kudos to PC Mag. for covering this topic online over time. It's not just a matter of paying inflated prices for an equivalent American product; you may not find one to buy.
Consumer routers have much higher penetrance in the U.S. market than drones, I think a safe assumption. And many are provided by ISPs, which are businesses supplying what's considered a very important 'information utility' of sorts. So I don't think we'll be unable to obtain routers.
But at what cost? What about 3rd party options so we're not stuck with whatever the ISP is handing out, which may or may not have a rental fee?
In such a market, if Apple did produce a new Airport router, how would it distinguish itself? If Apple tried to provide Apple ecosystem advantages, E.U. legislation-based attacks demanding inter-operability with competing platform companies could sabotage that.
There may be a push for DIY routers, but I've watched some content on that option, and the project looks to remain beyond the expertise and comfort level of the average home user.
From the article:
"At present, the US is in what I think is best described as a cold economic war with China, and drones are one of its victims. In the past few years alone, the US has levied tariffs on its exports, restricted what tech the country is allowed to import, and now the FCC is banning its technological exports willy-nilly. In recent months, the FCC has gone after everything from robot vacuums to internet routers to portable power stations."
While this thread is not in Political News, if Fisher's belief is correct, it has implications for how regulation may proceed going forward, including for consumer routers (relevant to this thread).
"American drone companies aren't delivering equipment for consumers; they're all about industry, agriculture, and public safety, markets that are far less price-sensitive than gig workers trying to pay their rent by..."
"Simply put, there are no good camera drones made in the US. When I spoke to Arthur Erickson, the CEO of US agricultural drone firm Hylio, earlier this year, he told me that the US was one to three years away from making a drone that could compete with DJI's latest 249g flagship, the Mini 5 Pro, and that it would likely cost $4,000 to $5,000 at retail, more than five times the cost of the DJI model."
"Its public notice seeks to ban the sale and import of all foreign drones with LiDAR obstacle sensors, thermal cameras, ..."
"Several consumer drones use LiDAR to intelligently avoid obstacles and crashes—LiDAR makes a drone safer to fly in crowded environments. The entry-level DJI Neo 2, midrange Mini 5 Pro, and pro-grade Air 3S all use it. Thermal cameras are crucial for first responders performing search and rescue and for inspectors looking for heat leaks around a home or an industrial site."
The article is worth a read, and kudos to PC Mag. for covering this topic online over time. It's not just a matter of paying inflated prices for an equivalent American product; you may not find one to buy.
Consumer routers have much higher penetrance in the U.S. market than drones, I think a safe assumption. And many are provided by ISPs, which are businesses supplying what's considered a very important 'information utility' of sorts. So I don't think we'll be unable to obtain routers.
But at what cost? What about 3rd party options so we're not stuck with whatever the ISP is handing out, which may or may not have a rental fee?
In such a market, if Apple did produce a new Airport router, how would it distinguish itself? If Apple tried to provide Apple ecosystem advantages, E.U. legislation-based attacks demanding inter-operability with competing platform companies could sabotage that.
There may be a push for DIY routers, but I've watched some content on that option, and the project looks to remain beyond the expertise and comfort level of the average home user.