US Courts Reject Apple...

saving107

macrumors 603
Oct 14, 2007
6,376
14
San Jose, Ca
FYI: Your title is mis-leading.

but Judge Lucy Koh noted that Apple had proven it's likely to succeed in proving that Samsung's product infringe its patents — the injunction wasn't granted because Apple didn't prove that leaving Samsung's products on the market would cause irreparable harm. If Apple ultimately wins, Samsung will just have to pay damages on whatever infringing products it sold in the meantime.
http://www.theverge.com/2011/12/3/2...-apple-preliminary-request-ban-samsung-galaxy
 

M Quick

macrumors 6502
Nov 9, 2011
418
1
Stockholm, Sweden
I think it's good that they get rejected, what they do is not OK. Monopoly is not something the usual customer want companies to achieve, competition on the other hand is what consumers love!

Those who does not is pretty obvious on who they might be...

Oh well.. you can read the article in many ways too i guess.. ;)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.