I am considering buying the new 13" macbook pro and while browsing the apple store I saw both the price in dollars $1199 which is £775 and the UK price is £999. So i was just wondering if anyone knows why there is such a huge difference in price?
Exchange rate? VAT? Because it is more expensive for Apple to do business in the UK?
How do you explain pricing in Scotland where everyone is famously tight? (I'm Scottish so I can say that)
If you don't like the taxes, vote in the election in 4 weeks![]()
You're forgetting, in the USA they also don't have any kind of import tax, whereas in the UK, when you import a high value item (even if for resale) you have to pay ~15% Import Tax AND 17.5% VAT (Apple won't have to pay it as they're VAT Registered).
So if you take the £775:
Add 15% import tax: £891.25
Add 17.5% VAT: £1047.22
So you're technically getting it cheaper than it should be!
Blame the stupid person currently in office in the UK. And just don't vote in the elections, they're all lying B****rds quite frankly.
The UK pricing is actually about right.
Take your example $1,200 + tax of an average of 6.5% = $1,278
The exchange rate is at $1.5 to £1 therefore $1,278= £852 + VAT (currently 17.5%) = £1,001. So almost bang on the same price.
Ah, I thought the US price of the base 13" was $999 but you're right it's $1199. That's £774 at present exchange rates(google "1199 dollars in sterling") or £909 including VAT. So we're talking a £90, or roughly 10%, disparity. It's probably reasonable as a hedge against foreign exchange risk.
Cheers,
jahman
$1,499 + tax (6.5%) = $1,596 = £1,064 + VAT (17.5%) = £1,250. Our store price is £76 less. So again, in the UK we pay less for our Apple gear to Apple than they do in the US. The UK taxes make it look like we don't, but in fact we get a lot of our Apple gear cheaper than them.
You are adding two sets of sales tax.
If Apple wants to get $1499 from a US sale, they advertise for $1499, and the customer actually pays $1499 + for example 6.55 = $1596. If Apple wants to get $1499 from a UK sale, they need to convert $ to £, makes £969, then add 17.5% VAT, makes £1139. That should be the advertised price in the UK, and that should be what a UK customer pays.
You are adding two sets of sales tax.
If Apple wants to get $1499 from a US sale, they advertise for $1499, and the customer actually pays $1499 + for example 6.55 = $1596. If Apple wants to get $1499 from a UK sale, they need to convert $ to £, makes £969, then add 17.5% VAT, makes £1139. That should be the advertised price in the UK, and that should be what a UK customer pays.
VAT is inclusive. 999GBP before vat is ~825GBP. Which is about $1,280.
Relatively small difference, I feel like I've seen many things that have a higher price differential. Media, for example, you UK people pay through the roof for. How much are songs on iTunes? And new videogames over there go for 50GBP or $77.50, when they are $60 here.
VAT is inclusive. 999GBP before vat is ~825GBP. Which is about $1,280.
Relatively small difference, I feel like I've seen many things that have a higher price differential. Media, for example, you UK people pay through the roof for. How much are songs on iTunes? And new videogames over there go for 50GBP or $77.50, when they are $60 here.
Ah, I thought the US price of the base 13" was $999 but you're right it's $1199. That's £774 at present exchange rates(google "1199 dollars in sterling") or £909 including VAT. So we're talking a £90, or roughly 10%, disparity. It's probably reasonable as a hedge against foreign exchange risk.
Cheers,
jahman
The US price is without taxes. I worked forward from there to a price in sterling inclusive of VAT of £909 at present exchange rates, a difference of £90 or roughly 10%. You've miscalculated your figures: £999 including VAT is actually £850 excluding VAT not £825. £850 is $1315 giving a disparity of $116 which is still in the order of 10% of the US price excluding taxes.
Cheers,
jahman
In most markets outside the USA they use the excuse of "import costs" but if you break it down they charge far more than that. It is just greed. They see the opportunity to slide some more profit in and they take it. The thing that get's my goat is that they lie about it and call it "import costs" as if it has nothing to do with them.