USB 3.0, Thunderbolt, and Spinning HDDs

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by Jacobwilson99, Aug 30, 2012.

  1. Jacobwilson99 macrumors member

    Jun 3, 2012
    I read somewhere that traditional hard drives do not fully saturate the capacity of USB 3.0. The poster's point was that, if a spinning drive could not saturate 3.0, then it will not saturate Thunderbolt, or even utilize it near its potential.

    Is this correct?

    Here's why I ask. I am looking for a portable external for my rMBP.
    I was going to get a Seagate GoFlex 1.5TB with the Thunderbolt adapter to utilize the speed and available ports. However, if the notion above is true then the adapter is useless where speed is concerned. It simply utilizes a thunderbolt port instead of a USB.

    Can one successfully utilize thunderbolt speeds with a spinning drive? I thought it could, so I guess I'm looking for confirmation contrary to the first paragraph.

    If so, what are other solutions to a bus powered 1TB-1.5TB drive with thunderbolt? Seagate adapter....Buffalo Mini Station...anything else?

    If USB 3.0, and subsequently TB, cannot saturate a spinning drive, then I'll be in the market for a USB 3.0 drive.
  2. pgiguere1 macrumors 68020


    May 28, 2009
    Montreal, Canada
    Correct, Thunderbolt is pointless for external storage unless you're using SSD. If you want an external spinning hard drive, save some money and get a USB 3.0 one.

    In the coming years external Thunderbolt SSDs will be more affordable and at that point Thunderbolt will make more sense.

    I'd post a comparison graph from Anandtech to prove this but it appears to be down right now.
  3. Orlandoech macrumors 68040


    Jun 2, 2011
    Salt Lake City, UT
    What he said
  4. Jacobwilson99 thread starter macrumors member

    Jun 3, 2012

Share This Page