Step 1... buy a PC and not a Mac..
people just dont get it
this only kills the touch bar -
Step 1... buy a PC and not a Mac..
Do you have a source supporting your assertion the bezels were Apple's contribution?
I use a 55" curved Samsung TV and a 27" LED Cinema Display, but the TV is several feet back. It's pretty amazing, actually.Agreed, 34inch is really the upper limit for a desktop use...
Curved is nice for large displays. When you turn your head to the extreme sides of the screen, it aims a little bit toward you, whereas with a flat panel the angle would be facing away, making it more difficult to read. Again, this is effective for large displays. It is pretty gimmicky for smaller displays in my opinion.I don't understand the attraction of curved TVs, curved computer displays even less so. It reminds me of the geometry settings you used to have to use to eliminate as undesirable on CRT displays.
Still amazing to think how many pixels these things are packing regardless, my first computer was usually at 320x256 on a 14 inch TV...
I am in no way ready to buy any of these right now, but I quite fancy the idea of a nice big 4K display wall-mounted and simulataneously hooked up to a mac and a 4K UHD BD player one day... (even better if it could be the same machine, but probably not).
I love that MacBook stand—the mStand by Rain Design, right? I have a similar setup at home but with an older 27" IPS display that isn't retina. I wish my mid-2012 rMBP could run 4K at 60Hz…sigh. As for my work setup, I wish it was that clean! I mean, it's not too messy and I could clean it, but it has probably gotten a little out of hand with STUFF. I've got 13x19" prints of my photography work and family plastering the walls. On my desk there are toy dinosaurs, legos, nerf guns, and random gadgets.
Which monitor does Adobe RGB?Why would anyone want a monitor that could only do sRGB vs one that could do the entire Adobe RGB 1998?
Agreed, 34inch is really the upper limit for a desktop use...
I would think Apple would be somewhat embarrassed that the MacBook Pro can now run more 4K displays than a Mac Pro. But they still have a typo on the Mac Pro "Buy It Now" page so.....Mac Pro withers away.......
Sadly....its unfortunate. This happens because Apple refuse to allow users to upgrade internally.I would think Apple would be somewhat embarrassed that the MacBook Pro can now run more 4K displays than a Mac Pro. But they still have a typo on the Mac Pro "Buy It Now" page so.....
It would be nice if the original article include PPI data for each monitor.
I'm coming from an Apple Thunderbolt Display. From what we've used (also priced in the $1k range), the LG design is unacceptable. I'll never understand why they couldn't just give us the iMac sans computer (same connectors too). I say unacceptable, but I'll be buying it anyway lol.
Who else finds it strange that the sale price is good only for December, but the display is only available for sale in December. I hope they don't sell out too quick.
I bought mine in college when I had a smaller desk setup. I spent about an hour slowly bending it so the angle is less shallow and the gap underneath is taller so I could type on the keyboard while it was underneath the stand. Worked pretty good!Yea it's the mStand. I love it and it functions as a heat sink which is a plus.
I couldn't agree more. I still don't believe that Apple is out of the display business. There was never an official announcement or anything. The new MBP launch needed a companion display no question and I am hoping that Apple was simply stuck between a rock and a hard place and weren't able to offer their own solution in time...
Been using a 27" TBT for years and if Apple doesn't come out with an acceptable replacement soon I'm going to find a clean used 6-core nMP and hide under a rock for a few years until I'm forced to move on to whatever future they are trying to force their pro users to live with.
Why are you here? Nothing on this site appears to interest you.Step 1... buy a PC and not a Mac..
Every time there's Apple news, I appreciate my Hackintosh more and more.
Buy a PC like the $3000 SurfaceBook that can't even handle 5K, running Windows which can't yet handle HiDPI correctly.
And, so far, it's always worked. If I had more time and less money, I'd be quite inclined to try my hand at the Hackintosh game...
I'm with you on the Ethernet interface thing, and I think you nailed it when you said Apple eliminated it for thinness reasons. Given TB3's increased bandwidth (heck, even TB2 would do!), I Apple or someone else comes out with a 10GBE adapter.
I don't understand the attraction of curved TVs, curved computer displays even less so. It reminds me of the geometry settings you used to have to use to eliminate as undesirable on CRT displays.
I wonder if I should hold out or buy the 34 for £750.I love the 38! Just wish it was 5K!
Q. What do I need to use a 4k 27" DELL (P2715Q) at 4k@60Hz with the new Macbook-Pro?
A. USB-C to Display-Port should work.