Has Apple software QA truly become abysmal over the last few years or have social media, blogs, and videos just made it easier to surface problems? For example, would the current Apple have released Copland?
Or maybe Zuckerberg Commandment™ #3, Keep Shipping, has somehow made its way into Apple.
Well, no matter the reason...![]()
It gets a bit more complicated than that. We try to keep our systems reasonably up to date due to security issues. At the same time, our most sensitive systems need to be very behind on updates. The software our bank gave us to process checks and credit cards tends not to be very up to date. When you update the OS, the software crashes. The solution is, only use these computers for credit cards and checks. That and be ready for bad things to happen. (We keep these two computers on a separate network, yet they continue to make my hair fall out.)Let's cut people some slack. Apple's presentation of new features is so meticulously orchestrated that any person with a bit of interest in tech will get excited to experience that future now. It's not just on each person to be a disciplined human being and live by the concept of pleasure delayance.
There is a thing called mass psychology and - albeit in this case benign - Apple makes great use of it. I would argue Apple developed a habit to overpromise and underdeliver. Do I empathise with the complexity of it all, I do. But let's not pretend people are stupid for trusting a company known for quality.
Yes, some of us, experienced in Mac OS Upgrade cycles know when to upgrade or not.
But is that the majority of people Apple is targeting with its Hollywood-like productions of product launches? How often have we heard Apple gloating about the speed and numbers of new OS adaption amongst its user base. They *want* you to have the latest OS everywhere when it comes out. It's easier for them to manage and gives them control over when people feel the "friction" to replace their device with a shiny new model.
So
It's not just the "naive" user who's invested into Apple's products and clicks on a button.
Let's talk about why Apple is not delivering better quality and let's focus on ideas of how we can get to a place where a gold master is not handled like a hot potato but a stable system people can and should rely on, from the moment Apple says its not in Beta anymore.
The perfect symbiosis of hardware and softwareCan confirm. 16GB M1 Pro - Control Center was using 10GB memory the other day.
I agree. But there is still some range between "annoying nuisance" and "frequently crashing PoS". This may be anything in between.I guess the OS displaying dialog saying the device has run out of memory is quite an issue on its own. A normal user should never see such a popup with normal usage, yet they do atm.
No one disputes developing stable software is anything but complicated.It gets a bit more complicated than that. We try to keep our systems reasonably up to date due to security issues. At the same time, our most sensitive systems need to be very behind on updates. The software our bank gave us to process checks and credit cards tends not to be very up to date. When you update the OS, the software crashes. The solution is, only use these computers for credit cards and checks. That and be ready for bad things to happen. (We keep these two computers on a separate network, yet they continue to make my hair fall out.)
I am seriously thinking about running those apps in a virtualized sandbox. The problem with adding another layer is, you are adding another layer that might have an exploit. When it comes to security, keep it simple.No one disputes developing stable software is anything but complicated.
It's not only complicated it can get very complex very fast.
But the narrative of the "naive user" is getting old.
Apple should work on stable and sustainable solutions that work independently. A core dedicated to security updates, independent of os upgrades.
As a matter of fact I'm not even sure that that's even the case. I don't know your situation in detail. But if it were as you say, I would want Apple to implement a secure framework within Mac OS that allows critical areas of legacy software to continue to run smoothly and safely.
But one has to assume they just don't want to be bothered with another layer of complexity. And it's just not a feature that works to wow people waiting for the next cool thing.
It's a pity we have to even argue about who's fault it is if a system designed by Apple is crashing after an upgrade. I'm hearing people saying "but what about third party software". It still runs on Mac OS. Apple's domain. Apple's responsibility.
True. Sandboxing is not a permanent solution either.I am seriously thinking about running those apps in a virtualized sandbox. The problem with adding another layer is, you are adding another layer that might have an exploit. When it comes to security, keep it simple.
Exactly![...] A normal user should never see such a popup with normal usage, yet they do atm.
Mine actually stalled. The music kept playing, but I couldn't do anything until I force closed that specific application.Just curious; are machines actually grinding to a halt (which would be a symptom of running out of memory), or is it just an alert? The latter is annoying, and shouldn't be happening, but not a huge problem.
Time to upgrade to M1 Pro or Max with 64GbIt happened to me when I used FCPX with M1 and 16GB memory. It reached 64GB memory that I have to force to quit the software many times.