Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

sparkie1984

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Dec 20, 2009
2,909
2,227
a small village near London

ColdCase

macrumors 68040
Feb 10, 2008
3,364
276
NH
Plenty of folks do that. Its just a little slow if you have large libraries or heavy photo edits. A directly attached TB drive would be much more responsive, but responsive is subjective. Using wired ethernet is faster, but you'd have to get an adapter as I don't think the MBPr has an ethernet port.

How will you be backing up your photo library? Many use a drive directly connected to the computer for performance, and then a slightly larger NAS as a CCC backup destination (as an example).
 

MCAsan

macrumors 601
Jul 9, 2012
4,587
442
Atlanta
I use LaCie Thunderbolt RAID sets for my library. TB is much faster than Ethernet as a transport. Much of the time the transport layer is not the problem, it is slow drives. Use 7200rpm drives with 128MB cache. Set them up as RAID 0 for max performance. Naturally be sure to have a good backup system with TM or CCC.
 

sparkie1984

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Dec 20, 2009
2,909
2,227
a small village near London
Thanks guys,

Basically I have an iMac with internal 1tb drive which backs up to a dedicated time machine 2tb drive.

I was thinking of buying a 4tb nas but using raid to give me 2tb with a backup.

I'm trying to think longer term as much as possible as I'm going to be getting into photography in the not too distant future.

My library is currently about 500gb.

Would I be better to look for something to connect directly? I was trying to limit connections to the laptop and thought an Ethernet connected nas may be a good shout. However if it won't play well I'm happy to directly connect it.

If you had £250 ish to spend what would you get?
 

ColdCase

macrumors 68040
Feb 10, 2008
3,364
276
NH
RAID is not backup, good for redundancy and work through a disk failure, but backup via mirroring it is not. Mirroring drives is better than nothing, however :)

I would buy two drives, a 2TB+ for your machine to hold your working library, a 3TB+ USB to attach to your time machine. Use CCC or something like it to backup your working drive to the backup drive. Get a TB drive for your working library if you can afford it, otherwise USB3 is OK for photos. Not all play nicely with the Mac OS, and most have one quirk or another, so shop carefully.

IMHO, those two drives will allow you to get started with photography until you determine that you want to get serious... then we can start talking servers, DAS, RAIDs, and NAS things.
 

sparkie1984

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Dec 20, 2009
2,909
2,227
a small village near London
Thanks for that really helpful post mate.

I'll get looking into thunderbolt drives, will a hard drive be faster in thunderbolt than usb3? Or is it purely having a reliable connection?

Thanks again
 

MCAsan

macrumors 601
Jul 9, 2012
4,587
442
Atlanta
Thanks for that really helpful post mate.

I'll get looking into thunderbolt drives, will a hard drive be faster in thunderbolt than usb3? Or is it purely having a reliable connection?

Thanks again

A given spinning HD with the SATA III interface is only so fast. So the transport layer of USB 3 or TB will both do a decent job. You will waiting on the drive, not the transport layer. It is when you start using RAID 0 disks or using SSDs that the the transport choices between USB 3 and TB starts to be noticable. Personally I like TB as I can chain them from my TB Display.

Look for drives at least 7200rpm, 64MB cache (128 is better), and SATA III (6Gbps) internal interface. The drive connects via SATA to the enclosure's controller with does the translation to the external interface of USB 3 or TB.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.