Using your MacBook with the new LG UltraFine 4K display (USB-C)

Discussion in 'MacBook' started by BeatCrazy, Oct 27, 2016.

  1. BeatCrazy macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    #1
  2. whiteonline macrumors 6502

    whiteonline

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Location:
    California, USA
    #2
    It's nice the MacBook is supported, but 21.5" is a bit small....
     
  3. rmm805 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2014
    #3
    Especially for the price.
     
  4. mathpunk macrumors regular

    mathpunk

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2015
    #4
    Looks awesome! I've been waiting for a 21" 4K display to show up. I had the 27" Thunderbolt Display for years that I used with a MacBook Air, and I actually found it too big. Once I went retina with the 12" MacBook, I could never go back to a non-retina display. So, for retina I think the 4K 21.5" is perfect for a desktop display, and I will probably order one of the new LGs next month.
     
  5. BeatCrazy thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    #5
    True, and I use a 24" now. But I imagine the quality is very good.
     
  6. thadoggfather macrumors 604

    thadoggfather

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
  7. Dunbar macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #7
    How is this better than other 4k displays that support USB-C?
     
  8. BeatCrazy thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    #8
    Under System Requirements it says "USB-C-enabled Mac". And the product description specifically references MacBook (in addition to MacBook Pro) several times.

    It seems to imply that the 2015/2016 MacBooks will display 4K at 60Hz.
     
  9. thadoggfather macrumors 604

    thadoggfather

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    #9
    i would personally want explicit confirmation of 2015

    afaik 2015 isn't capable of 60hz 4k, only 30hz unless this display works some magic hence my skepticism
     
  10. BeatCrazy, Oct 27, 2016
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2016

    BeatCrazy thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    #10
    The 60Hz 4K support is implied, because the associated USB ports on the LG are limited to USB 2.0. And we know that the MacBook's USB-C throughput can support 4K @ 60Hz if you knock down the USB data lanes to 2.0.

    Both Intel Iris 5300 and Iris 515 (MacBook 2015 and 2016 respectively) can support 4K @ 60Hz, it's always been the USB-C w/USB 3.0 support that throttles the video.
     
  11. thadoggfather macrumors 604

    thadoggfather

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    #11
    i haven't kept up, thanks!

    it would be cool for someone to try the 21,5" with 12" combo

    5-6 weeks wait, yikes
     
  12. BeatCrazy thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    #12
    Well for sure it works, because it explicitly says "MacBook", and "USB-C-enabled Mac". Can't describe the 2015/2016 MacBooks any more succinct than that!

    I currently use 4 computers connected to my Dell U2413 monitor, including my 2016 MacBook via the CalDigit USB-C dock. I'm not aware of any USB-C adapter that would allow me to switch between HDMI/DVI/DP like I do via separate inputs on my Dell today. Too bad!
     
  13. Dunbar macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #13
    I have a 2015 Macbook and with an LG 27UD88-W. With the Sierra update you can choose 4k native in the OS although I think you'd be crazy to do that on 21" display. I usually run it at 2560x1440 or 1080P high DPI mode.
     
  14. BeatCrazy thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    #14
    Was it the 10.12.1 update that made this possible? The new LG monitor specifically requires 10.12.1, so I'm wondering if Apple did some jiggery pokkery with this latest update to enable 4K on the standard MacBooks, similar to what that patch/hack has been doing.
     
  15. daijholt macrumors 6502a

    daijholt

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2013
    Location:
    Wales, UK
    #15
    It does appear to be compatible with MacBook 12". The 4K model says compatible in the Apple Store app (my MacBook is called ShadowGold)

    The 5k model says nothing however, so that looks to be Pro exclusive.
     

    Attached Files:

  16. BeatCrazy thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    #16
    As expected. 5K takes serious GPU power.
     
  17. iDemiurge macrumors 6502

    iDemiurge

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Location:
    Portugal
    #17
    I'm honestly surprised with this. If it does indeed support full res at 60 Hz on the 2015 mb I'll be really tempted to get one. It also seems to have speakers, but does anyone know whether it has audio out?
    --- Post Merged, Oct 28, 2016 ---
    At 60 Hz?
     
  18. Dunbar macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #18
  19. iDemiurge macrumors 6502

    iDemiurge

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Location:
    Portugal
    #19
    Thanks, that's real interesting. I had heard about the patch but thought it was for the 2016 model only (or I guess the patch was indeed made only for the 2016 model). But Sierra seems to have enabled 4k@60hz on both the 2016 and 2015, without need for any patch, as you confirm.

    I know 4k native is crazy cause it'd all look too tiny, but you do suggest it works in hi dpi mode, right? Is performance too dreadful/stuttery compared to what you get on the main screen without any external monitor attached?
     
  20. mathpunk macrumors regular

    mathpunk

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2015
    #20
    Decided to order the new 21.5" LG today; ships early December. I will probably run it in 1080p.
     
  21. BeatCrazy thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    #21
    No audio out, per pictures on apple.com
     
  22. Dunbar macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #22
    The patch actually worked on my 2015 Macbook. No stuttering that I've noticed. The only hiccup is if you unplug your Macbook from the monitor a lot it sometimes you have to reboot to be able to select the scaled monitor resolutions. Keep in mind I have a 27" monitor but yes 1080P hi dpi looks good but doesn't really take advantage of the larger monitor real estate. I love that you can do 2560x1440 with Sierra as that gives you more real estate to work with (albeit with smaller text.) Honestly Apple has some catching up to do with scaling the UI to 4K. Windows 10 handles it better.
     
  23. bluewooster macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    #23
    Does the patch not work if you have already upgraded to Sierra?

    I bought a 4k monitor and hooked it up with the provided HDMI cable and the Apple Digital AV Adapter. I only have 4k at 30 Hz as an option - no options for hi dpi scaling. If I use a software solution, I can have 1080p hi dpi at 30 Hz.

    I tried the patch (and disabled SIP first using the instructions on the 9to5 site) but it gives me multiple error messages when I run it in terminal (I gave it permission with chmod +x first).

    I was hoping that Sierra would give me various hi dpi options (1440p would be perfect) without needing to patch anything. Is there something else I should try before returning the monitor?

    (This is the monitor if that matters)
     
  24. Precursor macrumors 6502

    Precursor

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2015
    Location:
    Istanbul
    #24
    Why buy that new 4k monitor which is 21.5 inches when there is already LG27UD88 which is also 4k and 27 inches?
     
  25. BeatCrazy thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    #25
    My theory is that there is some trickery with macOS 10.12.1 and the 21.5" UltraFine version (only) that allows for 4K @ 60Hz from a MacBook with no hacking.
     

Share This Page