Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I wouldn’t be too sure, the surface area of the iPad can be plenty so unless the new chips are going to run super hot or be less efficient overall I wouldn’t bet money on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Supermallet
The chassis is too thin for a vapour chamber, thinner than the iPhone Air in fact. Would be nice to have though for that bit of extra sustained performance in place of a fan.
 
Samsung Galaxy Tabs, including the Ultra, I think they have this, so Apple should definitely do it too. Doesn't hurt having it.
 
  • Love
Reactions: hovscorpion12
Not necccesary on such a large device. Dispersion can move the heat along metal plates instead.

Size is not the reason for a vapor chamber. The thermal conductivity of a VC is like 10x of solid copper.

Heat no longer moves slowly atom by atom, but rather by gas filling the chamber almost instantaneously. Basically eliminates hot spots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hovscorpion12
Samsung's tablets since the Tab S9 have included a vapor chamber. This included the recent Tab S11 and Tab S11 Ultra.

It may not take up the whole interior, but it comes come with one. If Samsung can do a vapor chamber in their tablets since 2019, So can Apple.

The 17 Pro is only the beginning. The Vapor Chamber WILL come to the iPad Pro and MacBook Air.

Not a question of if, but a question of when. Could be next month, or a few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blkjedi954
Your hand that holds the iPhone will also work as good insulator making it more useful in an iPhone. Not so on an iPad. I think the battery will be the (usual) problem and not overheating. If they think a vapor chamber sells more iPads, they will included it!
 
M5 Chip with a big Vapor chamber in a new iPad Pro would be a game changer. This is a must have feature in the upcoming iPad Pro.
Why? What would it actually do differently? Does the current iPad Pro thermal throttle a lot? As an owner of one I would state no it doesn't. And it has a huge metal back to dissipate the heat with.
 
Why? What would it actually do differently? Does the current iPad Pro thermal throttle a lot? As an owner of one I would state no it doesn't. And it has a huge metal back to dissipate the heat with.

To some degree, yes. When exporting 4K/60 proRes on Final Cut, the back can get a bit warm. Which ends on throttling the charge percentage. Even though it's connected to a 250W Anker Wall charger.
 
To some degree, yes. When exporting 4K/60 proRes on Final Cut, the back can get a bit warm. Which ends on throttling the charge percentage. Even though it's connected to a 250W Anker Wall charger.
So it doesn't throttle performance, just the rate to charge at for a few short minutes. Hardly warrants a total internal design change and putting a vapour chamber in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hovscorpion12
So it doesn't throttle performance, just the rate to charge at for a few short minutes. Hardly warrants a total internal design change and putting a vapour chamber in it.

For me [personally], not from what I have noticed. I've thrown more video resolutions at the M4. From 1080p to 8K and can say it handled with ease. From timeline scrubs to edits. With iPadOS 26 now officially supporting background tasks, there could be some throttle. Especially if start working on another video editing project with Safari, Affinity and Youtube all open as well.

Gaming performance on the other hand could have some throttle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pezimak
For me [personally], not from what I have noticed. I've thrown more video resolutions at the M4. From 1080p to 8K and can say it handled with ease. From timeline scrubs to edits. With iPadOS 26 now officially supporting background tasks, there could be some throttle. Especially if start working on another video editing project with Safari, Affinity and Youtube all open as well.

Gaming performance on the other hand could have some throttle.
I play games a lot and never notice any throttling, but I don't glue myself to an FPS counter like some do. But to me it performs brilliantly. I don't think they will make it thicker now though, so it would be interesting to see how they get a vapour chamber in it. Then again I was surprised they did it with the iPhone.

If it's necessary I'm sure they'll put one in though.
 
  • Love
Reactions: hovscorpion12
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.