This is pretty close to the data I'm also be seeing from speedsmart.net speed test on iOS and Android Verizon is the fastest but T-Mobile isn’t far behind.
That's all well and good when you're sitting around the campfire swapping stories.As for availability, I went camping with a bunch of friends a while ago and was a little bummed when everyone with Verizon still had coverage and I did not with T-Mobile. Then I realized that I was camping! The whole point was to get away from everything and "disconnect" for a while. I admit that it was difficult to not have service but in the end I am glad.
I took a business call in the Grand Canyon hence the comment and yes it's beautiful.Really!? Here's an idea, put the phone away and enjoy the Grand Canyon.
But seriously, I'd think your home area where you use your phone the most would be more important.
I'm in a southwest Chicago suburb and Verizon speeds are garbage (mi-fi). My ATT phone maintains a reliable connection/speed as does my wife's T-Mobile phone.
I've said this in another thread here, but this exact case happened to me. When I was in the Boundary Waters near the US/CAN border camping with some of my wife's family, I hurt my back pulling a canoe out of the lake, and because my and my wife's phones were VZW, we were the only ones with enough signal to find and call an urgent care clinic in the town nearest us (about 20 miles away). The other family members were using either US Cellular or T-Mobile.That's all well and good when you're sitting around the campfire swapping stories.
Now what about when the weekend is over and you'd like to use Google Maps to figure out how to get home again? Or if you got lost hiking and would like to use your phone to find your way back to the campsite?
There are plenty of reasons why you want signal even in the wilderness that do not include people wanting 24/7 access to their social media feeds.
AT&T is already better than T-Mobile in California and probably everywhere else. Coverage matters, not speed.So Verizon and T-Mobile will be winning all the awards from now on. AT&T and Sprint need to step-up their game!
I think the speed tests are bogus. I see 50mbps with a speed test on AT&T, yet it loads a video from a fast server at like 500kbps.
I wonder which one you are in. I find AT&T to be garbage in Wheaton, Naperville, Glen Ellyn, Westmont, Downers Grove. I switched to Verizon, and went from 1 bar to 4-5, and much faster speeds as well.Really!? Here's an idea, put the phone away and enjoy the Grand Canyon.
But seriously, I'd think your home area where you use your phone the most would be more important.
I'm in a southwest Chicago suburb and Verizon speeds are garbage (mi-fi). My ATT phone maintains a reliable connection/speed as does my wife's T-Mobile phone.
I know I had that problem with TMobile data on my iPad, which is why I shut it off. Do your T-Mobile customers have trouble getting signal inside of buildings?
I'm more interested in coverage in remote locations, like the Grand Canyon, than a minute difference in speed in populated areas.
I already said I made a business call whilst in the Grand Canyon. The "little" service there was, was enough to make a call.You realize that The Grand Canyon is a National Park? There is little or no cell service in National Parks by design. If you want that to change, you need to write a letter to your congressman.
Yep. I just tested mine. Telus in Calgary at 3 bars. Hit 100. I know we pay some of the highest mobile data plans in the entire world but sometimes you get what you pay for. I was in the States last month on vacation and couldn't believe how slow the LTE was. I kept switching between T-Mobile, Verizon and ATT and none stood out as being faster than the other.In Canada
![]()
![]()
I wonder which one you are in. I find AT&T to be garbage in Wheaton, Naperville, Glen Ellyn, Westmont, Downers Grove. I switched to Verizon, and went from 1 bar to 4-5, and much faster speeds as well.
I'm more interested in coverage in remote locations, like the Grand Canyon, than a minute difference in speed in populated areas.