I don't currently have Verizon. Would these 'non-advertised' plans be available only to existing customers?
Correct all NEW customers have to go with the share plans
I don't currently have Verizon. Would these 'non-advertised' plans be available only to existing customers?
most ppl, such as myself have a corporate discount.
I only think the share everything plan is good if you have more than one line or if you have a tablet connected.
Between my wife and I, we have two iphones and two ipads. With this plan, we save over $40 a month (based on the cheapest data for the ipad). Another benefit is that our ipad lines are actually eligible for upgrades, so I plan to transfer those upgrades to my iphone lines to get the new iphone 5. We can basiclly upgrade every year now.
I only think the share everything plan is good if you have more than one line or if you have a tablet connected.
Between my wife and I, we have two iphones and two ipads. With this plan, we save over $40 a month (based on the cheapest data for the ipad). Another benefit is that our ipad lines are actually eligible for upgrades, so I plan to transfer those upgrades to my iphone lines to get the new iphone 5. We can basiclly upgrade every year now.
I thought the cheapest plan was 2GB for 30 dollars a month plus the smartphone adjustment of +$40 making the total $70 for a 2GB plan unlimited text and calls nationwide.
70 bucks isn't too bad really
I don't currently have Verizon. Would these 'non-advertised' plans be available only to existing customers?
So I've been trying to decide between Verizon vs. AT&T. That is until just now when I went to build an order on the Verizon site and the cheapest 2GB option is $60/mo, but here's the kicker - ON TOP OF THAT I HAVE TO PAY A $40/MO SMARTPHONE ACCESS FEE TO USE MY $60/MO PLAN! I then chatted with Verizon customer srv and they confirmed this. No basic, non-shared plans available.
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!PURE EXTORTION!
HOW DO THEY GET AWAY WITH THIS, AND HOW DO THEY COMPETE WITH AT&T?
AT&T now does the same thing with their plans too ($40/month for smartphone access). They're all extorting the customer.
They compete with AT&T because AT&T's prices are not much better. In fact, if you go the mobile share route like the Verizon plan you're likely to pay about the same give or take a few bucks.
The only major difference right now is that AT&T is not forcing customers into mobile share plans just yet, so you can potentially custom tailor a plan that's a little cheaper. But frankly, it's not going to be that much cheaper.
If an additional $33 per month is going to make or break you, then you might not be able to afford a smartphone in the first place. You want cheap, go with MetroPCS and then deal with terrible coverage. You want good coverage in nearly every place, pay for Verizon. You get what you pay for.
For the record, I'm not saying I support Verizon's changes, but that it's really not something worth getting that upset about. Not like Verizon holds a gun to your head and forces you to pay for service through them.
Do you know if this is the same with AT&T? And is it still only $10 extra a month for each iPad even if you buy an iPhone with that line?
If an additional $33 per month is going to make or break you, then you might not be able to afford a smartphone in the first place. You want cheap, go with MetroPCS and then deal with terrible coverage. You want good coverage in nearly every place, pay for Verizon. You get what you pay for.
For the record, I'm not saying I support Verizon's changes, but that it's really not something worth getting that upset about. Not like Verizon holds a gun to your head and forces you to pay for service through them.