I originally bought a Verizon iPad2 last week giving up hope that I would ever find an AT&T model in stock, but lo and behold this morning I was able to snag a 64GB white AT&T model at my local Apple store in Peoria, AZ at Arrowhead Mall. I was about 50th or so in line and got really lucky!!! Thats besides the point. Since I have both models I figured I would post some real world test results. These test were taken in north Phoenix. The first test was inside with AT&T having only 3 Bars and the second is outside with 4 bars on AT&T and full Bars on Verizon. Looks like AT&T is a winner for me. Sorry if a post like this already exists. Let me know what your results are if you also have both models and live in a different area.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Verizon vs. AT&T real world test results on iPad2
- Thread starter mattaz02
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
thanks for testing and sharing. i am sure there are many ppl like me who wants to know which is the better carrier. i didnt have the ipad1 and bought the at&t ipad2 (altho it's being sorted by eskimos in alaska right now, so i still havent had any first-hand experience with the 3G 
)
)Let's see some results on AT&T EDGE... then the test will be fair. While I'm streaming Netflix on my Verizon iPad, let's see how painful it is to access CNN.com on your AT&T iPad. It would be embarrassing in EDGE territory.
I don't think too much of you get out and travel to see how horrible AT&T is. When I'm up in an area without 3G, my iPhone is pointless for data.
Where I have AT&T 3G there's always hotspots. Thats because 3G is only in heavily populated areas.
I don't think too much of you get out and travel to see how horrible AT&T is. When I'm up in an area without 3G, my iPhone is pointless for data.
Where I have AT&T 3G there's always hotspots. Thats because 3G is only in heavily populated areas.
Just as another data point:
Berkeley, California
AT&T (tested on iPhone 4)
.66 down / .05 up
Verizon (iPad 2)
1.74 down / .76 up
I think the general consensus is Saturated Market (NYC, SF) = Verizon, Unsaturated Market = AT&T
Berkeley, California
AT&T (tested on iPhone 4)
.66 down / .05 up
Verizon (iPad 2)
1.74 down / .76 up
I think the general consensus is Saturated Market (NYC, SF) = Verizon, Unsaturated Market = AT&T
Exactly! AT&T is fast in dense, urban areas, but absolutey terrible in most other areas. I would love to see Verizon vs. AT&T Edge as well.
Me
, but supposedly AT&T has way more coverage of 3G in my area starting the 31ST. Well, that's what the map says!
No offense, because I know you were just trying to post some interesting data and get feedback, but given that you can literally move 5 feet and have very different results, this type of test is essentially meaningless. There are just too many variables involved. People typically know who the "A game" carrier(s) are in their area.
Again, I mean no disrespect but this really won't be of great meaning.
Again, I mean no disrespect but this really won't be of great meaning.
Me
Well, that's what the map says!
I wish you luck friend. It must be irritating as all hell waiting for pages to load T_T
I do simular tests between my AT&T iPhone and my Verizon iPad and find that my iPad is about 50% slower than my iPhone.
I was in Vegas for 5 days this past weekend and we had 3 AT&T iPhones in our group, none of us could use the web, text or call each other. We had to use my Verizon iPad for everything.
This drives home the point that even though Verizon maybe slower, its more reliable.
I was in Vegas for 5 days this past weekend and we had 3 AT&T iPhones in our group, none of us could use the web, text or call each other. We had to use my Verizon iPad for everything.
This drives home the point that even though Verizon maybe slower, its more reliable.
Who says I moved only 5 feet. Do you think I live in a trailer? I moved at least 8 1/2 feet! Lol. I was going to do more tests in different areas and post them as well but I gave my Verizon iPad to my sister who's about an hour away. I may post some later. Thanks for the feedback
I have the same problem in Vegas! Which is why I'm thinking about changing the iphone to Verizon and having the AT&T iPad, since I'll use my phone a lot more than the iPad.
At first I was fine with the fact I bought the Verizon iPad... Then I started to read all the negative in these forums. On Sunday, my mom had her Verizon iPhone here so I compared it to my AT&T phone, and her downloads were far from slow and MUCH snappier than mine.
I live in NY.
I figure, between m AT&T iPhone and Verizon iPad, Ive got all bases covered
I understand that. That's why I invited other people to post their results to get some different data. Thx for the response.
Verizon Result in SF Bay Area
I had a chance to test the speed while riding bus so here you go:
Tested by Speedtest.net App.
Verizon iPad 2 32GB in San Francisco Bay Area (BERKELEY)
Signal Strength: 5 Bars
Test Date: Mar 27, 2011 12:03
Connection Type: Cellular
Server: San Francisco, CA
Download: 2.17 Mbps
Upload: 0.91 Mbps
Ping: 170 ms
So Verizon got the coverage and got the speed in my area. Anyone with AT&T result in SF Bay Area? It would be interesting to know. AT&T or Verizon really depends on location and signal strength.
I had a chance to test the speed while riding bus so here you go:
Tested by Speedtest.net App.
Verizon iPad 2 32GB in San Francisco Bay Area (BERKELEY)
Signal Strength: 5 Bars
Test Date: Mar 27, 2011 12:03
Connection Type: Cellular
Server: San Francisco, CA
Download: 2.17 Mbps
Upload: 0.91 Mbps
Ping: 170 ms
So Verizon got the coverage and got the speed in my area. Anyone with AT&T result in SF Bay Area? It would be interesting to know. AT&T or Verizon really depends on location and signal strength.
Last edited:
I posted about this on another thread, but this might have been the better place, so ...
If you travelled extensively through rural America ... with no real pattern, no no way to predict where you are going to be ... and it was really important to have reliable service/gps in these areas ... would you go Verizon or AT&T?
The coverage maps seem to indicate that Verizon has far more 3G areas than AT&T (where they go down to Edge), but I have no idea whether those maps are reliable.
We're journalists and are all over the place, so it's really tough to figure this out. Big cities usually aren't part of our agenda, tho.
Thanks for any and all opinions.
If you travelled extensively through rural America ... with no real pattern, no no way to predict where you are going to be ... and it was really important to have reliable service/gps in these areas ... would you go Verizon or AT&T?
The coverage maps seem to indicate that Verizon has far more 3G areas than AT&T (where they go down to Edge), but I have no idea whether those maps are reliable.
We're journalists and are all over the place, so it's really tough to figure this out. Big cities usually aren't part of our agenda, tho.
Thanks for any and all opinions.
The raw speeds are irrelevant to me. I got 3G as a backup to WiFi, and as a motorcyclist I am usually riding where there is no ATT 3G coverage so VZW is a no brainer.
Vegas? Come on. I was just there a month ago and I had rock solid AT&T signal just about everywhere, with the exception of deep inside some hotels.