That is absolutely irrelevant. If their patented technology is in the A4, then they should get a percentage of the income derived from the A4 consistent with the amount of their technology's contribution to the A4 as a whole. Compensation for invention, that is how patents are supposed to work.
This is good, since not too long ago there would just be huge awards based on how much money the infringing product had brought in. We now have the test of relative value to the whole product. If they win, it shouldn't be much given it's three minor technical aspects of a chip with tens of thousands of technical aspects, most much more important.
How could it possibly be irrelevant to whether or not Via has been harmed or not, whether they have been harmed or not?
You seem to agree with me, and yet you dont. I just dont get you here :- )
----------
If their problem is competing with ARM, then they should have sued ARM. You don't sue the customer of your competitor. You sue your competitor.
You sue wherever your ip is infringed. But by all means s/ARM/Apple - happy?