Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

absolutmp5

macrumors regular
Original poster
Aug 12, 2004
110
0
So I do alot of wedding videos and live event videos. My primary camera's are the 5d mark ii and t2i. I usually would convert to prores and edit on my old 2007 mbp. Now That I finally have some consistent income I would like to get a more beefier rig considering also 5d mark iii might have a more demanding higher quality video codec.

So After looking at the tests, it really worth it to get the upgraded processor of 3.4 ghz i7 and possibly a 2gb video card? Also keep in mind that final cut pro x will match my workflow and I will be switching to that very soon.
 
i7 is worth it due to Hyper-Threading. It can boost the performance by up to 30% in some tasks and video editing should be one of them. The 2GB GPU shouldn't make a big difference though so personally I would skip it.
 
The 2GB GPU shouldn't make a big difference though so personally I would skip it.

Normally I'd agree with you since a display image won't even use 16MB of RAM. However, I wonder if FCPX's major use of Grand Central Dispatch and especially OpenCL to make full use of the system might make more GPU memory desirable? It would take a benchmark to know for sure.
 
I too have the same question (although i am looking at the 21.5" iMac). I will be doing some video editing and some music editing and am debating if the i7 is worth the 200 dollars more.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.