I’m so bloody fed up with the patent system! Invent it, use it, or lose it. Good lord, I loathe these leeches who only exist to suck money out of someone else’s work.
It certainly not gonna come out of the investors' pockets so someone has to foot the bill on this massive payout.That’s crazy. Never thought about it. Raise prices to make up lost revenue.
Wrong. In case you've been living under a rock, Apple makes and sell things.
VirnetX doesn't product ANYTHING. ZIP. NADA. ZILCH.
You wouldn’t be a troll.I don’t buy that definition. IMO, the actions taken by owners of patents is what defines them as trolls, not the organization of their company. A company that make products could act like a troll and a company that only owns patents could behave ethically and not be a troll.
If I’m a small independent inventor, and I come up with a new invention, then I’m supposedly a patent troll because I don’t actually manufacture anything? What if I want to license my invention to a large company, because I don’t have the millions (or billions) required to go into production? Suddenly I’m a troll just for creating something but not producing it myself?
which in turn defines the word "irony"... apple does exactly the same thing with patents, so...
Apple has actual products and 80% of their employees are probably engineers creating new products.
Who the hell are they putting on these juries?
VirnetX originally had 4 patents related to LTE. They have never used one to sell an actual product. They have over 100 now. Nothing they created, just bought up. 90% of their employees are lawyers.
They define the term "Patent Troll".
which in turn defines the word "irony"... apple does exactly the same thing with patents, so...
Yeah they will be losing money to patent trolls and losing money selling products? That makes sense.And it will be so until Apple releases a sensibly priced modular MacPro and MBP![]()
Except the every iPhone designed they’ve made has been patented so.....You are allowed to create & hold a patent without releasing a product. Have a look how many patents apple holds, yet hasent released 1 product based on them!!
Except the every iPhone designed they’ve made has been patented so.....
Yes, they’ll just read the headline and never know that the patents at issue have already been invalidated by higher courts.Going to be lots of MR posters celebrating tonight. Seems like they’re only happy when something negative happens regarding Apple.
PTAB isn’t a higher court.Yes, they’ll just read the headline and never know that the patents at issue have already been invalidated by higher courts.
Oh ok, I misunderstood what the article was saying wrt the patents being declared invalid in cases being handled by the U.S. Court of Appeals.PTAB isn’t a higher court.
The purpose of a patent is to protect an active endeavour. If you sell it to a patent holding company, then you really has not taken your idea seriously nor tried to venture it. If you were serious of the idea, then you most likely should have sought companies in the field to pursue a possible collaboration or further advancement of the idea. If the patent was considered to be not of economic value, then there won’t be takers and the idea should go back to general circulation to assist the next great idea, as for academic research. Of course, reality is never that simple and laxity in the laws permit trolls to exist.If I’m a small independent inventor, and I come up with a new invention, then I’m supposedly a patent troll because I don’t actually manufacture anything? What if I want to license my invention to a large company, because I don’t have the millions (or billions) required to go into production? Suddenly I’m a troll just for creating something but not producing it myself?
Whilst that may be right, do two wrongs make a right, I mean someone being a patent troll makes it Ok for you to steal something they own does it?Apple has products on the market. The definition of a patent troll includes holding patents but not having a product.
The purpose of a patent is to protect an active endeavour. If you sell it to a patent holding company, then you really has not taken your idea seriously nor tried to venture it. If you were serious of the idea, then you most likely should have sought companies in the field to pursue a possible collaboration or further advancement of the idea. If the patent was considered to be not of economic value, then there won’t be takers and the idea should go back to general circulation to assist the next great idea, as for academic research. Of course, reality is never that simple and laxity in the laws permit trolls to exist.
What value does IP have if you can't assert it? And what good is IP if you can't sell it?
which in turn defines the word "irony"... apple does exactly the same thing with patents, so...