hehe299792458 macrumors 6502a Original poster Dec 13, 2008 783 3 Jul 15, 2009 #1 mine is currently at 42.98GB on startup. I have 4Gb of ram installed. Is that a bit too large?
belvdr macrumors 603 Aug 15, 2005 5,945 1,372 Jul 15, 2009 #2 Not necessarily. It's no different than having a 60GB drive with 4GB of RAM.
MacDawg Moderator emeritus Mar 20, 2004 19,823 4,505 "Between the Hedges" Jul 15, 2009 #3 hehe299792458 said: mine is currently at 42.98GB on startup. I have 4Gb of ram installed. Is that a bit too large? Click to expand... Why do you think it is too large? Woof, Woof - Dawg
hehe299792458 said: mine is currently at 42.98GB on startup. I have 4Gb of ram installed. Is that a bit too large? Click to expand... Why do you think it is too large? Woof, Woof - Dawg
hehe299792458 macrumors 6502a Original poster Dec 13, 2008 783 3 Jul 15, 2009 #4 MacDawg said: Why do you think it is too large? Woof, Woof - Dawg Click to expand... This is on my umbp. on my mba, which only has 2Gb of ram, the vm size is only around 6-7Gb. I know that since the machines aren't identically configured, all comparisons are inaccurate, but the difference is quite dramatic
MacDawg said: Why do you think it is too large? Woof, Woof - Dawg Click to expand... This is on my umbp. on my mba, which only has 2Gb of ram, the vm size is only around 6-7Gb. I know that since the machines aren't identically configured, all comparisons are inaccurate, but the difference is quite dramatic
belvdr macrumors 603 Aug 15, 2005 5,945 1,372 Jul 15, 2009 #5 True, but the VM size is nothing more than the image file size.
V Vanarak19 macrumors 65816 Feb 18, 2008 1,099 71 Jul 15, 2009 #6 run the compressor, I bet you get some space back. It takes about 1hr though.