because vmware is really bad about not adding support for new OS releases into their older versions
like ANY version below 4.1.3 refused to launch in 10.8
imagine if they had done the month before thing when releasing 4.x (Sep 2011), suddenly in April 2012 you were looking at buying new in less than a year if you wanted an OS upgrade
unknown if this becomes the case for 10.9 also, their host/client support resources aren't current
VirtualBox!!
Because I'm cheap!
Actually you don't really need to be upgrading, I've tried the earlier version of VMWare Fusion and It runs Windows perfectly fine on Mavericks..
I don't think you're cheap, it seems like only yesterday I updated to Fusion 5. This annual payment hike is tiresome
Currently using Parallels and VirtualBoxWhy isn't virtualbox a real option? I've never used it, just curious.
Are you also tired of the annual payment hike for OS X
I use Parallels for my Windows Remote Desktop sessions access the servers I admin.
I installed it, it replaced VMWare Fusion 5. It crashes each time it attempts to launch. I restarted. will reinstall now. I don't have a list of things to try, to fix it.
Are you also tired of the annual payment hike for OS X or are you only tired of the annual payment hike for third party software like VMWare Fusion...?
It's expensive to live in Apple land. I think everybody knows that by now.
I haven't used VMWare so I have no comparison there, but I used to use Parallels every day until I discovered VirtualBox. Now I use VB exclusively.If anybody wants to get a taste of virtualization without paying for software, I'd highly recommend Oracle's VirtualBox.
I installed it, it replaced VMWare Fusion 5. It crashes each time it attempts to launch. I restarted. will reinstall now. I don't have a list of things to try, to fix it.
I haven't used VMWare so I have no comparison there, but I used to use Parallels every day until I discovered VirtualBox. Now I use VB exclusively.
One of the most time-consuming tasks with a VM is restoring a session, and under Parallels this would take close to half a minute. But on the same machine VirtualBox can restore a session in the same OS in about 8 seconds or less.
Runtime performance of VB is also very good, though I've not done formal benchmarking.
Flexiblity, ease of use, and compatibility with most recent Win and Linux versions also favor VirtualBox for me.
Many people think that free software must be cheap in its craftsmanship as well, but everything from Webkit to Darwin and a hundred other examples shows that's not the case. Free software uses a different development model, but not necessarily a cheaper one.
If you like the VM you use, by all means keep enjoying it. But if you haven't tried VirtualBox in a while, you may be pleasantly surprised.
Boo. I bought Fusion 5 on July 6. No free upgrade for me. :-(
Are you also tired of the annual payment hike for OS X or are you only tired of the annual payment hike for third party software like VMWare Fusion...?
It's expensive to live in Apple land. I think everybody knows that by now.
Parallels is worse. Seems to be an industry thing.because vmware is really bad about not adding support for new OS releases into their older versions
like ANY version below 4.1.3 refused to launch in 10.8
imagine buying 3.x in June and if they had done the month before thing when releasing 4.x (Sep 2011), suddenly in April 2012 you were looking at buying new in less than a year if you wanted an OS upgrade
unknown if this becomes the case for 10.9 also, their host/client support resources aren't current
Way to turn this thread about people using Windows into a complaint about Apple.
----------
Parallels is worse. Seems to be an industry thing.
Actually you don't really need to be upgrading, I've tried the earlier version of VMWare Fusion and It runs Windows perfectly fine on Mavericks..