Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

wallny

macrumors newbie
Original poster
This Anandtech post says that the 1.6g cpu from 11" Air doesn't have VT-d technology, which can be found on 1.7g i5 or 1.8g i7.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4554/apples-11inch-macbook-air-core-i7-18ghz-review-update

I've googled "VT-d" but those tech terms seem too obscure to me.

What's the real benefit in Parallels Desktop? I do a lot of Windows stuff on PD, is the performance gain (if any) from VT-d noticeable?

I just bought my $1199 11" air a few days ago. Is it worth the hassle to return and re-order a customized one with the 1.8G core i7 cpu, just for the VT-d?
 
You won't be able to use VT-d stuff anyways. The only advantage for VT-d are for workstations with multiple processors and multiple graphics for direct I/O.

Parallels uses a virtualization, which is VT-x supported.
 
This Anandtech post says that the 1.6g cpu from 11" Air doesn't have VT-d technology, which can be found on 1.7g i5 or 1.8g i7.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4554/apples-11inch-macbook-air-core-i7-18ghz-review-update

I've googled "VT-d" but those tech terms seem too obscure to me.

What's the real benefit in Parallels Desktop? I do a lot of Windows stuff on PD, is the performance gain (if any) from VT-d noticeable?

I just bought my $1199 11" air a few days ago. Is it worth the hassle to return and re-order a customized one with the 1.8G core i7 cpu, just for the VT-d?

VT-d is an implementation of IOMMU there is no performance gain in virtualization unless you need it (imagine a pci-e card, and having the virtualized OS direct access to it)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.