Now that we've heard a bit more about Core M, we can fill in further gaps in our knowledge about the rest of the Broadwell lineup. Intel says that Broadwell chips are five percent faster, on average, than Haswell chips running at the same clock speed. This IPC gain isn't mind-blowing, but it's not bad given that Broadwell is a refinement of Haswell and not an all-new architecture.
Speed gains in higher-end chips are more likely to come from clock speed increases enabled by the switch to 14nm, as well as the improved CPU and GPU clock speed scaling that the Core M chips benefit from. Intel is promising performance gains from Core M despite halving the TDP of its Haswell-based predecessor, so clearly there's room to increase performance a fair amount while keeping power usage roughly the same (more likely in desktop parts) and to increase performance a little while reducing power usage (more likely in laptop and U-series processors).
We can also assume that Broadwell's integrated GPUs will be stratified in much the same way that Haswell's were. They'll all share the same basic architecture and API support, but higher-end CPUs and chips with higher TDPs will be able to be paired with more powerful GPUs. The GPU with the Core M will likely be on the lower end of the spectrum, while quad-core desktop and laptop CPUs will be the most likely candidates for a new high-end Iris Pro chip. Some socketed Broadwell desktop CPUs will actually get to use Iris Pro GPUs this time aroundthe only Haswell CPUs that can use Iris Pro 5200 are soldered to the motherboard, and socketed desktop chips are saddled with slower HD 4000-series GPUs.