Nope, forum name isn't a guarantee
Hah! That reminds me of something actually used to attack me in the WT forum. For daring to object to SOME of the criticisms, a number of them decided to claim I was Knighton! It served as a convenient way for them NOT to even consider any arguments agains their claims. But one was really funny. She took my name, said it mean the "big chief" or something, thus it was a clever way for Knighton to post there using a different name.
Of course, it wasn't true, but that tends to not matter to some people. But what makes it funny is where my name actually came from. It was the name of my favorite pizza place on the island of Oahu! I think they go by "Big Kahuna's" now, but originally it was the same as I spell it.
I have a hard time understanding why everyone hasn't cancelled their orders by now, or why you are still willing to help them by being a tester for their product.
Well, it's easy for me but I don't know if I can get those who disagree to understand my reasoning, but here goes:
1. I think it is a brilliant idea. Not just because it is so small but because I can see a possibility that it could actually work better than regular keyboards (won't know until I have lots of time to use it). That's why I decided to take the risk and order in March.
2. And I did consider it a risk. It still wasn't shipping, so clearly it was still being cleaned up. It is always possible that it could be impossible to get to work well enough, or could close down for any number of reasons. The deciding factor for me to go ahead was that WT is much the same people as an existing company (NextEngine). That gave be just enough to feel the risk was small - but still a risk.
3. I also decided from the start that I was willing to take a complete loss if things turned out badly - bankruptcy where customers get nothing back. Doesn't mean I would never cancel, but it did mean I was going to wait a very long time.
4. Since I really want to try it as soon as possible, testing was a natural thing to apply for. Based on the agreement, there isn't really anything we MUST do (there are things we can't do, such as talk about unannounced products). But I also enjoy testing some things. Besides stuff I've created myself, I was a tester for a pretty complete rewrite of the original AppleWorks (for the Apple II line) years ago. It was a bit of fun, actually, and I made some useful contributions - including one important bug that no one else had noticed. It's like doing logic puzzles, but for a useful purpose.
[doublepost=1456099061][/doublepost]
They said they'll ship in May 2015. Then they said they'll ship in summer. Then they said next month, and next month, and next month...
Some people call that deception, even if they do end up finally shipping the product.
Yep, some people do call it deception - and fail to consider any other factors. We do know they are really bad at some things but I see the most likely answer this way:
They thought they were almost ready to release each time. That is, either they didn't see any problems with the early testing of whatever the latest version was OR they thought the problems they did see would be easy to fix.
And over and over again they were wrong. You know, bad things happen sometimes. Criticism that they shouldn't give an time unless they are sure is fine - though companies do it all the time, not just WT. I've seen people say they shouldn't give each delay as just moving to the next month. Typically they say it should be 3 months "to allow enough time to fix things". The feel this would be good, yet it actually changes nothing. Consider, they miss February 2015 but instead of changing it to March and go through that monthly process, they say, "Our next estimate is May 2015". Okay, then what would have happened in May? They would have said, "Our next estimate is August 2015". Etc. Yeah, they make fewer changes, but now each delay is much longer. No net benefit either way. So even a commonly given "proper approach" given by many critics really doesn't help at all.
People forget that this isn't just another keyboard, thus problems should be simple to solve - old technology, right? No, this this is totally different in how it works and I don't think anyone could really be sure how long it may take. My personal theory was that the key magnet system (a major new approach to keyboards) had unexpected issues that they were trying to solve via firmware. Like possible inconsistencies in magnet strength, or changing strength over time, etc. Maybe not and I know there were other things they announced about it. Could be a series of different things too.
[doublepost=1456099191][/doublepost]
While I don't think the TextBlade is an out-and-out swindle by any means, this news story does speak to the mindset of many of those who remain bullish...
You might consider the possibility that we have considered all the negatives presented, weighed them, etc, and still decided to stick with the product longer. TREG is a very important step.