Am I the only one who thinks warranties are largely irrelevant on hard drives? I mean, your hard drive will fail at some point. That is a fact; HDDs are the component of your machine most "rated" for failure. And the warranty isn't going to entitle you to data recovery, which is comparably expensive. I've had no problem with the F1s (most of my slowdowns are a result of letting the hard drives go to sleep, which combined with a large amount of RAM, occasionally allows them to rest a bit more than they ought to), and I noticed that a lot of the poor ratings on NewEgg were due to firmware/chipset compatibility issues that the Mac Pro is exempt from. I think a warranty on a "guaranteed failure" part is not all that important if they're not going to replace what really matters, the data. After all, 1.5 TB drives are out now and if your drive fails within 3 years, a new 1TB drive is going to be even cheaper (they're already as low as $165 in some stores). Your drive is cheap. Your data is expensive (either to replace or in terms of man-hours spent generating it). I'd consider the technical aspects (fewer platters, higher density, running cooler...) of the drive to be far more relevant in purchase than the replacement warranty. And I can't speak to the experiences of others here, but I've had far, far more WD drives fail on me than Samsungs. Obviously, everybody else's mileage is going to vary. But isn't the warranty a pointless obsession with package print?
Disclosure: I scorn TN panels, integrated graphics chipsets, and I plan to fill all of the PCIe slots on my mac pro, so my opinion is necessarily irrelevant to a lot of people.