Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
fashion wasn't a reason?

I mean if it's on your ankle... then you really don't need an Apple Watch.
 
I could see doing this while cycling. When I get these stupid "walk 3 miles" a million times challenges in the month in summer when I cycle a lot, but don't walk that much.
 
I could see it when playing basketball cuz it can be a contact sport but would it be accurate
 
Something tells me there is significant overlap between this and people who sag their pants, and possibly people who bring Bluetooth speakers on trains.
Sorry, but I can’t disagree with this more. Wearing sag pants defeats the purpose to wear it around the ankle. It would be a hassle to check anything on the watch. Imagine lifting up your pants each time? That’s a no. 🤣
 
  • Haha
Reactions: amartinez1660
Is it April Fools Day already?

It seems the reporter is the one trying to justify this rediculous "look", as their wrist is too small. I've never seen this "look" & can only laugh at how someone is trying to create a fashion trend dead in the water 🤣🙄🤦‍♂️
 
Something tells me there is significant overlap between this and people who sag their pants, and possibly people who bring Bluetooth speakers on trains.
The article literally tells you its a trend among fitness people but something tells me you don't know many black people and your prejudicious view of black people is not reality.

Would you look at those saggy pants.
894c6e44-e5d5-4a8c-8af9-004369af2ba3
hfg37fztc24d1.jpeg
 
Doing my best to wear Apple Watch as least often as possible.
Workouts - yep. Everything else not so much. Was getting a rash on my wrist, and frankly was just overwhelmed with notifications. Notifications are totally off now, and I’m just tracking activity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
They’re lame to a lot of people. J Ive was right to position it in fashion, they need to revisit that strategy to attract non-tech, non-gym-bro people.
 
The article literally tells you its a trend among fitness people but something tells me you don't know many black people and your prejudicious view of black people is not reality.
Not that I really care, but the person in the original post never brought up blacks or race.

And not just black people sag their pants. I got a good laugh out of an adult white male I saw a couple of nights ago with his pants around his thighs and a belt to keep them there. Such lunacy is clearly not race specific.

I’ll keep my pants around my waist and my watch on my wrist, thank you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheGenerous
Doing my best to wear Apple Watch as least often as possible.
Workouts - yep. Everything else not so much. Was getting a rash on my wrist, and frankly was just overwhelmed with notifications. Notifications are totally off now, and I’m just tracking activity.
Are you getting a rash from the metal piece on the band? If so, I was doing the same and found a magnetic band that is completely wrapped in a rubbery material. Rash was gone after a few days! Let me know and I can send you a link to the band.
 


A report from The New York Times over the weekend highlighted the trend of people wearing an Apple Watch on their ankles, instead of the wrist.


Apple-Watch-Ankle.jpg


Apple Watch on ankle (Image Credit: The New York Times)

The report highlighted reasons why some people prefer to wear the Apple Watch on the ankle:

  • Some people with tiny wrists find the Apple Watch fits too loosely for heart rate sensing.
  • Some people with wrist tattoos believe the ink may interfere with heart rate sensing, which is something that Apple acknowledges in a support document. Apple says some tattoos can "block light" from the heart rate sensor on the bottom of the Apple Watch, making it "difficult to get reliable readings."
  • Some people believe the Apple Watch provides more accurate step counting when it is worn on the ankle, compared to the wrist.
  • Some people with skin conditions prefer to wear the Apple Watch on the ankle.
  • Some medical professionals cannot wear anything on their wrists.
Apple has not commented on the report, but its support documents and white papers for the Apple Watch mention that the device's heart rate and calorie measuring functions are validated for wear on the wrist, with no mention of the ankle anywhere. Apple has not publicly come out and advised people against wearing the Apple Watch on the ankle, but it is not something that its documentation acknowledges at this time.

Article Link: Wearing an Apple Watch on the Ankle? New Report Explains the Trend
Some people walk on the treadmill holding on because we would probably fall otherwise. So a watch on the ankle counts steps better than a watch on the wrist. This could be older people or those with a balance issue.
 
If you want to wear a pulse meter on your legs, why would you choose an Apple watch for it?
You can’t use 90% of its features there.
 
I’m a medical professional and we have to be “bare below the elbow”… I wear mine on my ankle only while in work. I’ve not noticed any difference/variations in heart rate, and oxygen saturation levels. It appears to accurately count my steps also.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beeneeord
Are you getting a rash from the metal piece on the band? If so, I was doing the same and found a magnetic band that is completely wrapped in a rubbery material. Rash was gone after a few days! Let me know and I can send you a link to the band.
Yeah, the metal disc for the snap. Thx!
 
Yeah, the metal disc for the snap. Thx!
This is it. The magnetic attachment is strong. I’ve ran with it daily, mountain biked, and wear it to work without it coming undone. Had it for a couple of months now and no rash!

Probably wouldn’t wear it on my ankle tho!
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: carrrrrlos
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.