Several have pointed to this job listing as a consequence of the specs leaked from Apple thursday evening.
It's unclear when this job posting appeared (pre or post leak)
It's unclear when this job posting appeared (pre or post leak)
Originally posted by Neuro
I'd say this proves it was a deliberate Apple marketing stunt. I wouldn't be suprised if the leaked specs were a red-herring, and will be higher than suggested...
Originally posted by theFly
The job posting appeared at least one month ago.
You can tell by the ID number on it which count up sequentially. That job starts 197... Apple's already in th 198 range.
theFly
Originally posted by backspinner
On http://www.macfreak.nl they say that the image was uploaded by someone outside Apple with the correct access rights... so if that is true then there is no ground for the "manager fired" theory.
"The circulating screenshots with specs of the new "PowerMac G5" appear to be a joke, as MacFreak is told from several sources, among which is a contact within Apple Cupertino. It turns out to be an action of a (former) employee of a bureau Apple is cooperating with once in a while. This person has uploaded an image with the 'specifications' of the G5 via Akamai. Akamai is a big Content Delivery Provider that provides Apple with hosting services for its AppleStore.
It's not clear what could have been this person's objectives. It's however certainly not a real mistake by Apple itself."
Originally posted by nagromme
Question answered then. An old job. The humor is unintentional!
As for the leak itself... if it were not accurate, even in the tiniest detail, surely Apple would have said so, to restore the surprise of Monday and control the damage. So I think they must be accurate--leaving Apple with nothing to say until after, when they may admit to an error or hack.
I still reckon these specs are conservative, - maybe dual 2.4Ghtz high-end. I also think that we will certainly see a 15" Powerbook 970 at say 1.6Ghtz.
Seems obvious, or why would Apple be so enthusiastic.
Originally posted by law guy
Of course, now that we've seen the timing of the "accident" in a larger context, it looks like the leak was very deliberate in order to build anticipation and garner media coverage for the Monday morning key note speech. As a planned leak, it was very successful, with major papers and websites picking up the story of the leak. I really don't think there was any accident at this point.