Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Shouldn't these contests be for amateurs only?
I'm mostly a website developer that uses my own photos and it's also a hobby of mind. I have seen many great photos done by amateurs. I remember a long time ago my late father taken a picture on his iPhone when he went on a cruise and I swear it could had been taken by a professional. I like entering this photo contest even if I don't win as it is neat seeing all the other photos.
 
I'm mostly a website developer that uses my own photos and it's also a hobby of mind. I have seen many great photos done by amateurs. I remember a long time ago my late father taken a picture on his iPhone when he went on a cruise and I swear it could had been taken by a professional. I like entering this photo contest even if I don't win as it is neat seeing all the other photos.
Some awesome photos I've seen over the years, and some very imaginative titles. My question, and perhaps I could have worded in better, was I had assumed it was for amateurs only, and was I correct.
 
Thanks for all your entries! Here's my judgement with some comments, which are all just my personal opinion:

@mollyc Juicy strawberries, accentuated by the depth of field, atmospheric lighting – gorgeous and delicious!

@iPhone-Guy Fat blueberries on the bush, not quite ripe yet. Don't worry about the portrait orientation, it fits the motive.

@Snowlover More fruit on their tree, apples this time, looking almost good to pick. I feel the photo would have more impact with a stronger focus on just one bunch of the apples.

@aperfectcircle Looks like a delicious birthday or anniversary meal with a side of strawberries. Nice lighting and depth of field, but I would have preferred the focus on the dish.

@Strider64 He seems happy with that fat, juicy maggot. A closer crop might have put him more in the spotlight, though.

@C0ncreteBl0nde Another juicy fruit, an orange this time. The depth of field nicely accentuates the details of the segments.

@kendallm That's a gorgeous and artfully decorated cake! Looks almost too nice to eat.

@BotchQue A tasty looking pizza, apparently handmade. By yourself?

@goldmac2006 A noodle soup with some meat and a good helping of leafy greens. An image worthy for a cookbook.

@Apple_Glen_UK A nice pint of Guiness fresh from the tap. The distortion from the wide angle length distracts a bit, but I guess the tight space didn't allow for a different point of view.

@StrollerEd A tasty looking slice of bread with what I guess is avocado creme, pine nuts, perfectly poached eggs, spices, and olive oil. Mouthwatering.

@arkitect Another appetizing shot worthy to go with the corresponding recipe. The dark background and the focus on the nicely browned crust make the image pop.

@squawk7000 A nice hot beverage (capuccino?) and a pastry (something like a fritter?) on a sunny day in an outdoor cafe. That's life!

Okay, that really wasn't easy. But here's my top 3:

3rd place: shared by @kendallm and @StrollerEd

2nd place: @arkitect

1st place: @mollyc
Oh, thank you! What an honor. I actually don't really do too much food photography, but this was jam day, and I always document jam day! Congratulations to @arkitect, @kendallm, and @StrollerEd too!

I will be back later with a new theme.
 
Some awesome photos I've seen over the years, and some very imaginative titles. My question, and perhaps I could have worded in better, was I had assumed it was for amateurs only, and was I correct.

All of the photography threads have always been open to anyone who wants to participate. We have, over the years, had legitimate working pros particpate in our threads, both the competitions and the POTDs and they have always been a joy to interact with. I don't think we have any current working pros who are active participants currently, although maybe some retired ones.

A professional photographer is one who is paid for their work. I know many hobbyists who have more talent in their pinky finger than a lot of paid for pros. Anyone can charge $100 for a mini session and call themselves professional, but that doesn't make them a good photographer. And plenty of people have worked on their craft for decades but don't make any money at it. Being a professional photographer is a somewhat arbitrary definition given there is no formal accreditation or education path. If you make money, you're a pro, if you don't you're an amateur.

There are 'professional' photographers who enter the competition, one only has to do some cursory 'internet searching' to see that.

What kind of "internet searching" are you doing, and why does it matter? If you look through the contest list you will see a wide variety of topics and winners using all sorts of gear over the years.
 
There are 'professional' photographers who enter the competition, one only has to do some cursory 'internet searching' to see that.
Posts like this annoy the crap out of me! Even when I haven't entered this one. So come on then - name names. Why have you put 'professional' in inverted comas? I don't know why you are worried anyway because I haven't seen you enter a competition.

On a lighter note - well done everyone, congratulations to the winners and I'm looking forward to the next one.
 
Congratulations to the winners! I had @mollyc photo picked from the get-go but as the contest went on, she had some serious competition. I'm not in the habit of taking photos of my food (it would quickly become very BORING, for one thing) so I chose a photo I had used to hone up on my macro lens.

I'm not sure what (or who) the gentleman's beef is with or why it needed to be brought up here. Many years ago I had a small studio and did some photography as a side hustle while working my "real" job (and as a PART of my "real" job) but I am far from a professional these days and am lucky to get out with my OLD gear or my iPhone to snap anything anymore. AFAIC, he's just being a troll for the sake of doing it.

Looking forward to the next contest! :)
 
Congratulations to the winners! I had @mollyc photo picked from the get-go but as the contest went on, she had some serious competition. I'm not in the habit of taking photos of my food (it would quickly become very BORING, for one thing) so I chose a photo I had used to hone up on my macro lens.

I'm not sure what (or who) the gentleman's beef is with or why it needed to be brought up here. Many years ago I had a small studio and did some photography as a side hustle while working my "real" job (and as a PART of my "real" job) but I am far from a professional these days and am lucky to get out with my OLD gear or my iPhone to snap anything anymore. AFAIC, he's just being a troll for the sake of doing it.

Looking forward to the next contest! :)
No, @Madonepro isn't a troll. I believe he is sincere in his questions. I'd just like to know why and what he would like to do about the contest, and if he'd truly like to exclude "professional" photographers. And if so, how we define that term (other than what I've outlined in my previous post).
 
Some awesome photos I've seen over the years, and some very imaginative titles. My question, and perhaps I could have worded in better, was I had assumed it was for amateurs only, and was I correct.

I'm curious about who you think is a professional, and why it would be a problem if they were? Nothing in the rules for these posts imply that its only for amateur photographers. I personally wouldn't mind having professionals here as I always love the critiques and feedback I get here. It's helped me become a better photography in the short time I've been taking pictures.

Also, just because someone is really good a photography doesn't make them a professional. Let's not diminish the talent of some of the folks here. It sounds like you are, incorrectly, equating talent to profession or occupation. I personally know really good artists who are intentionally not professional artists because they don't want their hobby to turn into a job. Similarly, I've seen professionals who are objectively bad at their craft. That doesn't make them any more or less professional artist.

I'm going to assume good intent, but please lets not equate talent with something else. Let's also not imply talented people can't participate.
 
I'm certainly not a professional photographer - & why the angry emoji on my post? Hopefully a slip of the finger?

Hi @Madonepro

I see that you have corrected the emoji, which I suppose was a slip of the finger.

I'd like to suggest that we should now reckon that you meant well but were a bit clumsy in expressing your admiration for the quality of photos, supposing that we were all 'professionals' ;)

If so, do join in the next one - even if you really are "David Bailey" *


* https://www.artnet.com/artists/david-bailey/
 
Terrific topic (and thoughtful judging) for the weekly contest, @Janichsan.

Personally, I loved the entries from @mollyc - wonderful colours, lines, composition and subject matter - I wished to devour those strawberries and loved the use of warm colour in the shot, and also salivated at the sight of @C0ncreteBl0nde's mouth-watering oranges, where again, I loved the warm summer colours.

And then, although this wasn't fresh fruit, especially the attractively arranged sort that seduces the viewer and tempts one's taste buds, I also loved @arkitect's hot cross buns; again, the colours, (warm, inviting, tantalising, tempting, just looking at them inspires an attack of sheer greed and a desire for an accompanying espresso along with a generous hand with a butter knife), composition, and subject all impressed.

Well done.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.