Well I got a reply back from Gizmodo...

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by Dammit Cubs, Apr 20, 2010.

  1. Dammit Cubs macrumors 68000

    Dammit Cubs

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2007
    #1
    My original email:

    Gizmodo's response:

    Maybe I should relook at the whole scenario again. I was douche trigger happy.
     
  2. Axl Rose macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    #2
    i think gizmodo is in the right here. apple already new who leaked it, plus other sites like cnn or whatever wouldve eventually reported his name. so whatever.
     
  3. Macjames macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Location:
    Yorkshire, England
    #3
    I appreciate you where looking out for him, and that was a nice thing for you to do :) but they where right, it was a kind of insurance for the guy if Apple decided to come down hard on him. In another light while Apple may be mad they will love the PR this has done for them.

    Oh, and another thing. This smells like one of the infamous Apple "controlled" leaks. Something is really bugging me about it.
     
  4. H00513R macrumors 6502a

    H00513R

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Location:
    Indiana
    #4
    Looks like you are a Cubs fan so you are probably used to blurting out things before thinking...like World Series baby! :p :D

    J/K I had to -White Sox fan here.
     
  5. Small White Car macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Washington DC
    #5
    What does that mean, "infamous?"

    Apple has never done anything like this before. How can this smell like something they've never done?
     
  6. gibbz macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    #6
    This is nothing like how Apple has leaked information in the past. This is not a controlled leak. I wish people would stop latching on to the phrase "controlled leak". Sheesh.
     
  7. nateharr macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    #7
    I agree with you about the douchyness.

    But other media outlets would have reported his name.

    Now I'm pissed that they are patronizing and openly mocking the guy. (That article about it being his birthday is low.)
     
  8. chembox macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    #8
    The phone was under his full control and it was 100% his fault for losing the iPhone. Why are we sympathizing him?
     
  9. smithrh macrumors 68020

    smithrh

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    #9
    Unprovable hypothesis.

    Giz=douche.
     
  10. Jack Dangers macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    #10
    I agree. If they had the info, how were others outlets going to report on it unless Giz is the one leaking his personal information. It's a terrible excuse.
    If Apple is going to fire the guy, they will fire him. They have enough reason to dismiss him. He is not being spared by the media attention he's getting. I'm disappointed by Gizmodo's level of reporting. Not because of the leak of the iPhone, but mostly because of outing the guy. Just lame.
     
  11. chembox macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    #11
    The real 'douchebag' here is the guy who originally found it, didn't make an effort to return it, and sold it to Gizmodo.

    People are scapegoating Gizmodo for doing it's job: reporting.
     
  12. pixelated macrumors 6502a

    pixelated

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    #12
    Maybe read a little more. He made an effort to return it by asking around the restaurant and even taking time out of his day to wait there in case the guy came back.
    Without a name to follow up on, i really cannot blame him for giving (or selling) Gizmodo the scoop.
    Should a random pedestrian be loyal to apples secrecy policies?
     
  13. protalk macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    #13
    You've never misplaced anything?

    You are exactly right. I just hope that if the editor of Gizmodo or others out there making this guy look bad ever lose something, it is both reported and ridiculed.

    We have all misplaced our keys, a phone, something. Very few of us ever had it written up in the press and it threatened our jobs. Sure, the phone is a story...but as a former television news reporter myself, it is wrong to suggest the guy who lost the phone is worthy of identification. It adds nothing to the content nor context to print the guy's name. It's just petty.
     
  14. LivingLarge macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    #14
    This Powell fellow should hold a press conference and let us know what exactly happened that fateful day in redwood city :D
     
  15. Jack Dangers macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    #15
    The news is the new iPhone and the story of how it was lost. But IMO, not the identity of the apple engineer and all his acquaintances.
    Who's next, the guy who sold the phone to them? It's silly and unprofessional. It's funny how blogs want to be treated as real media, but then they go off and pull a stunt like outing the poor guy who lost the phone.
     
  16. STEVESKI07 macrumors 68000

    STEVESKI07

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    #16
    I think it's a strange coincidence that the things he said he did to return it are all things that can't be documented or really confirmed/denied by anybody. If I find a lost phone, I first ask anybody in the immediate surrounding area if they know whose it is (which he supposedly did). Immediately after that I'd go in the recent calls list and call someone and tell them. (which he didn't do). I highly doubt he had intentions of returning the phone. He probably saw an iPhone laying there and picked it up figuring he could sell it on craigslist for $500 or so, just like 75% of people who find iPhone's would do.
     
  17. gloss macrumors 601

    gloss

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Location:
    around/about
    #17
    Except, you know, calling AppleCare and being turned away and given a ticket number.
     
  18. LivingLarge macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    #18
    i'm glad that there is at least that 25% of people who would actually turn it in to the bar or try to call owner or a contact, not everybody is that dishonest, to just sell it off.
     
  19. Small White Car macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Washington DC
    #19

    You really don't see the difference between "can't find the owner" and "accepting cash for the item"?

    There's, like, no gap there in your mind? No middle-ground or other choices? It's just all the same thing?
     
  20. STEVESKI07 macrumors 68000

    STEVESKI07

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    #20
    The 25% thing I said was just a ballpark guess. I think it really depends on the area you are in when you lose it. If I lost it at a bar by my house I'd say I have a good chance of getting it back. My roommate has a blackberry and has lost his 4 times and has gotten it back every time, but it's not quite as desirable as an iPhone. There are some areas where I'd say it's very unlikely to get it back though.
     
  21. LivingLarge macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    #21
    thats a fair statement. good and bad folks out there, i just hope a good one finds my phone if i lose it :)
     
  22. -aggie- macrumors P6

    -aggie-

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Location:
    Where bunnies are welcome.
    #22
    Because people make mistakes and people lose things. It's called empathy.
     
  23. thetexan macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 11, 2009
    #23
    Also people get fired, or laid off on a daily basis. Getting his name public was the best thing to happen to his career. The guy is talented enough to get hired on with Apple pretty much right out of school, he won't have a problem getting a new job if Apple cuts him. It'll be even easier now that his name is out there.

    The mistake is laughable, and if Apple really fired him for this simple mistake than Apple is a company which I'd never want to work for. I'd hate to see what happens to the guy that gets Steve Jobs the wrong flavored coffee. Gizmodo said it best... "After all, it's just a f***ing iPhone and mistakes can happen to everyone—Gray Powell, Phil Schiller, you, me, and Steve Jobs."

    Besides, Apple knew the phone was missing less than 12 hours after the device was left in a bar. If he was going to be fired it'd of happened by now.
     
  24. puffnstuff macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    #24
    Said it before and I will say it again the story is riddled w/ b.s they do not know how the person that sold them the phone got it. Once he got it though and saw Gray's fb page he probably made up a story from there. So to call this guy out is not helping him one bit.
     
  25. Ironworker808 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    #25
    I've found phones before. The first thing I do is go to the contacts list and look for Mom. Or Dad. Or Sweetipie. Or Babycakes, Shnookems, Googlybear, etc.

    Next I go to missed calls and usually there are ten or fifteen from a single number made from the guy missing the phone or a friend of his. If not, I start at the top.

    If one is going with the 'controlled leak' conspiracy theory, one could assume that the guy who 'found' the phone was a part of it. Apple doesn't leave anything to chance and IMO that would include 'losing' a prototype phone hoping that a random person would know to go to a gadget blog site so that it could be dissected and shown to the world.

    If Apple is indeed behind the whole thing (and that doesn't necessarily mean Jobs) then the 'random guy' who 'found' the phone did just enough to claim he tried to get the phone back to it's owner before going to Gizmodo, knowing his attempts would be brushed off as a hoax.

    Again, all of the above only comes into consideration if you believe that the entire situation is a setup by Apple.
     

Share This Page