You can upgrade Mac Pro CPUs![]()
Not without a ton of difficulty you can't. They weren't made to be upgradeable.
You can upgrade Mac Pro CPUs![]()
Not without a ton of difficulty you can't. They weren't made to be upgradeable.
With my old G3 tower, I was able to upgrade or add:
- RAM
- Hard drive (twice)
- processor
- Optical drive
- SCSI card
- and, of course, the monitor (twice).
... and as a result, the machine lasted 9 years as my only computer.
With my iMac, I can only do 1 of those 6 things.
How long will this iMac last? My guess is less than 9 years.
In my opinion, this is the worst flaw in Apple's Mac lineup, and it's been a problem for several years now. There's no upgradable computer for less than $2300. Sad.
Is not what you are looking for, at just about the price point you want, already being produced by Apple? What's wrong with this one:
Mac Pro--One 2.8GHZ Quad-Core Intel Xeon $2299
That one imac has a 3.06 ghz processor. That doesn't seem slower to me...
I was just looking and the base mac pro is only a $100 more than 3.06 imac
More powerful processor(s), faster non-laptop components, better optical drive(s), expansion slot(s), better (non-integrated) graphics, choice of monitor and much easier owner serviceability.
If they came out with a mini macpro with one quad core CPU, removable PCI express 2 graphics card, at least one PCI-e 4/8x expansion slot and 2/4 memory slots for around $2000 I'd buy one.
Desktop parts tend to be a lot cheaper than laptop components, so it's very feasible to have a $1500 computer with a 3Ghz processor and some fancy graphics card. Unfortunately for anyone who thinks that sounds good, there is no price point for it. $2000 is too close to the pro, and too expensive for the products mentioned. $1500 is sitting right in iMac territory. At the current price points, introducing another product wouldn't make sense as part of a unified product line that Apple sticks so strictly to.
Drop the mini and price it from $699-$1399. Use only Core i7 quads and re-introduce the old Quadra moniker.
With my old G3 tower, I was able to upgrade or add:
- RAM
- Hard drive (twice)
- processor
- Optical drive
- SCSI card
- and, of course, the monitor (twice).
... and as a result, the machine lasted 9 years as my only computer.
With my iMac, I can only do 1 of those 6 things.
How long will this iMac last? My guess is less than 9 years.
In my opinion, this is the worst flaw in Apple's Mac lineup, and it's been a problem for several years now. There's no upgradable computer for less than $2300. Sad.
I think you might have just answered the question "why does apple refuse to make a mid-tower computer?"
I think you might have just answered the question "why does apple refuse to make a mid-tower computer?"
Why give people the option to upgrade parts and keep them from coming back for a new system for so many years? It's one of the reasons apple makes so much money with such little market share![]()
Apple's stock price indicates weakness and is poised for a significant drop because savvy investors see that the growth period for personal computers is over; and Apple's high priced offerings have little chance of continued growth in a deteriorating economy.
Is this circa 2001?
Same argument that's been made many many times about apple...
Economy was bad last quarter but they made more money than ever in its history
Apple stock price has never represented their unit sales numbers