Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What Apple *should* do to fill the 12" Powerbook Gap
- Thread starter eidrunner247
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Don't tell me this. Apple is the biggest notebook vendor on college campuses. And yet they have so few models and so few options.
A product line that is not overly large helps eliminate customer confusion. But a small product line like Apple's makes many (like me) look elsewhere for more customizability and options.
Biggest notebook vendor on campus? Oh well. Just wait till you see companies order literally 1000's of Dells at a time. I can't being to tell you the stacks of Dells and IBMs I've seen in my day. When people say that Apple owns <10% of the market, they ain't kidding.
If you need lots of customization and options, then ya - a MacBook probably isn't for you. MS stuff is more "jack of all trades" and Mac stuff is more "one size fits all". Just get what works for you.
Wow, you certainly don't remember the 12" Powerbook very well do you? Firstly, it was NOT pro performance with iBook portability. It was a glorified iBook and nothing more.
It did not have the Powerbook 15" or 17" GPU, in fact it's GPU was only a little better than the iBook. The 12" Powerbook certainly did not have the power of the 15" or 17". It was always several hundred megahertz slower than the 15 and 17". Also the ram max was the same as the iBook.
Also there was no backlit keyboard on the 12" Powerbook and no option for it either.
Also there was no PC card slot.
Also there was no Firewire 800 like the 15 and the 17" had.
It also had a washed out screen with limited brightness.
It also offered a smaller HDD than the 15" and 17".
All of this describes the iBook G4.
What it HAD in common with the 15" and 17" was the obvious, an aluminum shell.
The new Unibody Macbook is not only the perfect successor to the 12" Powerbook, it certainly outshines it and is much closer inline with the pro models.
Apple have never been "one size fits all". That's totally the wrong mindset. If one size fits all, why doesn't one OS? Why don't we all use Windows?
Apple aren't a small company at all. That's a complete illusion. They've got $20-something billion in cash, and their market cap is 4x larger than Dell (82Bn vs 20Bn). In market cap terms, they're as big as HP. They have the fastest growing retail outlet of any kind, and their market share is hitting record highs. They're starting to be really popular with small businesses, have been #1 music retailer for a while now, and overtook the RAZR as the most popular mobile phone. Apple are massive.
Oh, and at one point earlier this year, their market cap surpassed IBM and Intel, and at another point Google. Don't tell me Apple is a small company.
Point well taken. There was a lot of complaints about the 12" Powerbook being a steep price increase to the somewhat comparable iBook.
Your characterization the Powerbook G4 12", however, tends to negate some of its features which separated it from the iBook. The 12" Powerbook has consistently featured a faster process than the iBook. Even when the processor was less than the 17" model, it tended to be equivalent to the base 15" model. Its graphics card also was superior to the iBook. Same with the hard drive, it tended to be equal with the base 15" model. Granted, it did not have a PC card slot or a the same graphics card as the larger models, but there were certain form factors to be considered. It would be tough (if not impossible) to integrate the same features into much smaller area without it running too hot.
And sure the max RAM on the Powerbook 12" was the same with the iBook, but I don't feel that maximum RAM capacity is an indicator of a Pro/consumer performance. The Powerbook RAM used faster RAM (PC 2700) than the iBook (PC 2100) (with the exception of the latest model iBook which ran at the same PC 2700 speeds). I mean, both the Macbook and the Macbook Pro hold the same amount of RAM, but that's not to say that the MBP is a supped-up MB.
That being said, we can technically consider every Powerbook/MPB a glorified iBook/Mb. The only differences are: (feature 1), (feature 2), (feature 3) that is present on the Pro machines but absent on the consumer models.
I think the Powerbook 12" had enough differences to take it out of the iBook category. I think you offer a fair assessment, but I take a alternative view on the differences.
The ibook screen was blocky and pixelated compared to the baby powerbook. The book only mirrored the internal screen on an external one, you had to hack it to do spanning. The last Book had 32 mb video card, the BPB had 64.
Apple's always put lower quality displays on its consumer models to save money. The MB is a better screen (IMO) than the book or plastic MBs, but it's not quite the same quality as on the MBP.
I agree with this. That is why it *might* be a good idea to drop the idea of a "Pro" machine. Just give us more BTO options. They could continue having 3 pricing points per model which would be available at stores but if someone wants a more customized machine, they have to use the website or order it at the store. Throw in an 11" model and I think it would make more people happy - not everyone, but that is life.
As far as the Air goes, I don't think re-thinking their models or adding an 11" model would cannibalize the sales all that much. 2-Dimensionally, the Air and the Macbook are very close and the fact that the Air is selling as much as it is truly surprises me. I know many would disagree with me, but to me the thinness and light weight are just not worth the price. But its sales speak differently, which goes to show you that customers want more variety.
Yeah. The air has a cool design, but it seems to be nothing more than 'the CEO's netbook'. Something thin and light so their Admin Ass't won't drop it or break it while they're going to fetch another cup of coffee..
The 12" Powerbook was slower than its 15" cousin. It had a slower CPU, slower graphics, and a measly 1024x768 screen. It didn't have a backlit keyboard, and in the first couple of revisions it didn't even have a DVD burner or built in wireless. The new Macbook is as close as it comes to a Macbook Pro, without the size. The high end Macbook and low end Pro have identical processors. Great graphics beating most dedicated solutions at that size and that price. The 12" Powerbook even weighs more than the new Macbook by 0.1 pounds believe it or not. The only thing the Macbook loses to the 12" powerbook on is the Firewire port.
Not to mention it clashed horribly with the 12" iBook.
Doesn't work like that.
Apple does own a 10% share of all computers, however if you actually look at what they are selling on a day to day basis they have a over a 20% share, putting them at the third/fourth largest OEM in the world, next to Dell and HP, and possibly Compaq. And they are growing at 50% per year. And specifically in the consumer market, they are the only guys making a profit.
Reason? A lot of consumers often take years to upgrade their computers, so the overall Mac install base will take quite a while to reflect what they are selling.
Apple are by no means a small company.
Apple is a huge company. The fact that they have so few models available points to the obvious: their limited lineup is directly tied to their profits. So by forcing the customer to buy much more than he actually needs, they obtain huge profit margins. They force customers to "buy up" to a MBP just to obtain one feature, like a bigger screen, or a graphics card that's worth anything.
Some, like me, refuse to buy into this scheme. But other loyal customers take it in full stride, unaware that if Apple actually had a more reasonable amount of models available, each customer would on average spend much less per machine.
Some, like me, refuse to buy into this scheme. But other loyal customers take it in full stride, unaware that if Apple actually had a more reasonable amount of models available, each customer would on average spend much less per machine.
# Apple employees - 32,000
# Dell employees - 82,700
# Microsoft employees - 90,000
# HP employees - 320,000
# IBM employees- 386,000
Besides, consumer market what it is (big, but not really that big), I've never seen huge amounts of Macs, except at schools. All those skyscarpers you see in downtown cores around the world? Packed to the gills with non-Apple computers. Packed.
And what's the deal with everyone thinking they're outsmarting Apple? So Acer sells a million different models of laptops - go buy an Acer then. Why the drama? Why do people come on boards like this to proclaim their awesome "insight"? Such weak sauce.
# Dell employees - 82,700
# Microsoft employees - 90,000
# HP employees - 320,000
# IBM employees- 386,000
Besides, consumer market what it is (big, but not really that big), I've never seen huge amounts of Macs, except at schools. All those skyscarpers you see in downtown cores around the world? Packed to the gills with non-Apple computers. Packed.
And what's the deal with everyone thinking they're outsmarting Apple? So Acer sells a million different models of laptops - go buy an Acer then. Why the drama? Why do people come on boards like this to proclaim their awesome "insight"? Such weak sauce.
The 12" PB was never as good as the 15" PB. Somehow we forgave that because it was the smallest/lightest Apple laptop for a long time (since the 2400c of 1997). But over the 12" iBook, the PB had a better screen, faster processor and Superdrive. Also it was thinner and lighter than the iBook.
There are two options for 12" PB owners, the Air, or either MacBook. Sorry but as a prior owner of a 12" PB, it is not all that great of a machine. If anything the 12" PB was not a downsized version of the 15" and 17" siblings, but rather it had its shortcomings to: i.e. soldered ram which limited how much ram. No PCMCIA card slot.
I think Apple has made the right decision to go with the Air and the MacBooks and Pros. 13" is certainly more of a sweet spot than 12" in terms of real estate vs. size. Air covers the weight aspect. The new MacBooks weigh what the 12" does/did - 4.5 lbs. And their new graphics chips are quite respectable.
I think Apple has made the right decision to go with the Air and the MacBooks and Pros. 13" is certainly more of a sweet spot than 12" in terms of real estate vs. size. Air covers the weight aspect. The new MacBooks weigh what the 12" does/did - 4.5 lbs. And their new graphics chips are quite respectable.
Unfortunately, the Air has a serious lack of ports and DVD drive. It was really going to be inconvenient for me to go from the 12"PB to that. The MacBook would have been the perfect upgrade for me if it had firewire - but for a lot of people this is probably acceptable.
I know that this is going to upset you all - but looking at the stats, it looks like the new macbook is the 12 inch powerbook to me. Unless this is a firewire issue, yet again
When looking at the stats- where is the room in the market for a 12 inch macbook - look at the weight and overall dimensions - i cant see a market for this if you put them in a shop side by side.
Now a lightweight 10 inch macbook air at $800 - thats a market i could see
When looking at the stats- where is the room in the market for a 12 inch macbook - look at the weight and overall dimensions - i cant see a market for this if you put them in a shop side by side.
Now a lightweight 10 inch macbook air at $800 - thats a market i could see
Attachments
Apple is not going to create a 12" notebook. 13" is the sweet spot, and then they have 15" & 17" models as well. The 13" comes in paper thin form for general use, or slightly thicker form (and lighter than the powerbook) for more serious use.
Apple will never make a netbook either. They will tell you the iPhone is just as capable as a netbook, and half the size. But anyways, I think the 2.4GHz 13" AlumBook is the best Notebook (Price to Spec) that they have ever created. Its a screamer with Pro features & aesthetics but with more portability.
Apple will never make a netbook either. They will tell you the iPhone is just as capable as a netbook, and half the size. But anyways, I think the 2.4GHz 13" AlumBook is the best Notebook (Price to Spec) that they have ever created. Its a screamer with Pro features & aesthetics but with more portability.
