Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yep, ask a few people with them how often they use it.

Likely not too often, besides boy street racers with the paddle shifter upgrades.

A manual is often much cheaper to buy. Depended on the manufacturer and the "required" options for an automatic upgrade and the semi-auto upgrade you'll probably save thousand(s). Unless you buy used and stick the previous owners with the initial pain of the upgrade.

I hate manuals though. I prefer to not have to do the clutch shift dance a thousand times and hour in traffic for example. Yeah they are cheaper and easier to repair...but I will take an automatic any day. I know some people like them in "performance" cars etc but even if I had a Ferrari I would still want it to come sans clutch pedal.
 
if your parents will swing for it, get a mercedes benz slk with tiptronic tranny. so fun and easy to drive. you can get one in great condition for 10-15k.
 
Just learn to drive a manual.

Even the nicest double clutch systems out there (say on the newest 911 Turbo) still won't do what I want, when I want. Often they'll flat out refuse to shift when you tell it to shift. While having a near instant shift is nice, it doesn't do you a lot of good on the track when it won't shift down until you're already out of the turn despite having mashed the paddle a dozen times before going into it.
 
Why are people saying that most cars have this feature? Maybe NEW cars, but certainly not old. The technology is fairly new, I believe it was installed in some cars in 2000.

It's called tiptronic, and not ALL cars have it.

Personally, I don't think it's a substitute to a manual transmission at all. Driving standard myself, I've driven tiptronic and find it stupid.
 
Like it or not double-clutch gearboxes are here to stay, and will eventually replace both manuals and autos, for good reason. They are superior in every respect.

I understand some people want a physical clutch pedal, but there is no technical or performance reason that requires it, be it for normal street driving or high performance driving. Anyone who thinks a double-clutch gearbox has lag like a fluid-coupled, torque-converting gear box either hasn't driven one, or doesn't know what they are talking about, or they are confusing it with the CVT transmissions that have appeared on a few cars.

If you understand what a double-clutch gearbox is and how it works in principle, you'll understand why it has no lag (by design) and why it is superior from a performance standpoint. There's a reason they come equipped in cars like the BMW M3, Porsche 911, Lancer Evo, Ferrari, Lambo, and so on.
 
Why are people saying that most cars have this feature? Maybe NEW cars, but certainly not old. The technology is fairly new, I believe it was installed in some cars in 2000.

It's called tiptronic, and not ALL cars have it.

Personally, I don't think it's a substitute to a manual transmission at all. Driving standard myself, I've driven tiptronic and find it stupid.
A Tiptronic is Porsche's normal fluid-coupled, torque converter transmission. It's just a normal auto with manual gear selection, and is not what we are talking about in terms of semi-auto manuals. Porsche's double clutch gearbox is called the PDK, short for Porsche Doppel Kupplungen.

Tiptronic is just a fancy name for a regular old slushbox.
 
Just learn to drive a manual.

Even the nicest double clutch systems out there (say on the newest 911 Turbo) still won't do what I want, when I want. Often they'll flat out refuse to shift when you tell it to shift. While having a near instant shift is nice, it doesn't do you a lot of good on the track when it won't shift down until you're already out of the turn despite having mashed the paddle a dozen times before going into it.
If you have problems downshifting a sequential or double-clutch gearbox on a track, then you are trying to downshift it with the revs too high to successfully complete the shift without over-revving. The car is just protecting you from driving it wrong and damaging the engine (what we like to call a money shift on a manual). I've driven an M3 (my own), an M5, and an M6 all with SMG on a track. I never once had a missed downshift unless I was in too high a rev range.
 
Like it or not double-clutch gearboxes are here to stay, and will eventually replace both manuals and autos, for good reason. They are superior in every respect.

I understand some people want a physical clutch pedal, but there is no technical or performance reason that requires it, be it for normal street driving or high performance driving. Anyone who thinks a double-clutch gearbox has lag like a fluid-coupled, torque-converting gear box either hasn't driven one, or doesn't know what they are talking about, or they are confusing it with the CVT transmissions that have appeared on a few cars.

If you understand what a double-clutch gearbox is and how it works in principle, you'll understand why it has no lag (by design) and why it is superior from a performance standpoint. There's a reason they come equipped in cars like the BMW M3, Porsche 911, Lancer Evo, Ferrari, Lambo, and so on.

There is a reason that they're on F1 cars. But the transmission programming on a F1 car is nothing like what is on your factory M3, 911, Evo, Ferrari, or Lamborghini. All of those factory cars have in-built protection designed to keep idiots from destroying the engine or the transmission, and as such will always fight the drivers command to some extent.
 
A Tiptronic is a normal fluid-coupled, torque converter transmission. It's just a normal auto with manual gear selection, and is not what we are talking about in terms of semi-auto manuals. Porsche's double clutch gearbox is called the PDK, short for Porsche Doppel Kupplungen.

Tiptronic is just a fancy name for a regular old slushbox.

k my bad then? lol...

I don't know much, but what I posted is what I learned over the years...
 
There is a reason that they're on F1 cars. But the transmission programming on a F1 car is nothing like what is on your factory M3, 911, Evo, Ferrari, or Lamborghini. All of those factory cars have in-built protection designed to keep idiots from destroying the engine or the transmission, and as such will always fight the drivers command to some extent.

Comparing to a F1 tranny is apples/oranges. They are their own animal and have more in common with motorcycle transmissions than anything we're talking about. Steve Machett did a "RPM" (Racing Per Machett) session explaining how they work on one of the Speed F1 broadcasts.

You are the only person I've ever heard make this claim about double-clutch gearboxes fighting the driver. I call B.S. and think it's more likely you're just trying to downshift before you've reduced speed enough. The gearbox computer is just saving you from over-revving and destroying the engine. So yeah, they'll fight you from destroying your engine. That's a good thing that it's impossible to do a money shift on these gearboxes.

Where do you track, and for how long have you been doing it?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.