Apple is not within their right to damage a device like that. They'll be in a world of hurt if they do. And online petitions are ridiculous twitter petitions are just downright stupid.
Just like all things in the world... the changes are 50/50. Either they will or they won't.
you must be fun at a dinner party
If they love watching their stock fall, and customers start twitter petitions/ start contacting attorneys, they'll be sure to do just this.
I am sure this what everyone would've said before Microsoft started bricking Xboxes.
I am also certain that it's in Apple's EULA to restrict people from modifying their iphones
Yeah, but it is their own security flaw that allows JBing. That, and the customer already bought the phone. You cant restrict access to it because of a security flaw in your own system.
I am sure this what everyone would've said before Microsoft started bricking Xboxes.
I am also certain that it's in Apple's EULA to restrict people from modifying their iphones
Just like all things in the world... the changes are 50/50. Either they will or they won't.
Your logic is flawed. Just because an event has a binary outcome does not mean that each outcome is equally likely. The odds may be unknowable, but that does not mean they are even. Let's take an absurd example; what are the chances that the United States will invade Canada? According to your logic, the odds are 50-50; either it will or it won't. Surely you will admit that the odds are actually far lower than that?
Not sure what you're trying to prove with that link; it doesn't seem to apply.
His assumption would fit into the two-tailed test, in which does not apply to the current situation.
I think you misunderstand the two-tailed test. kzoojason76 is very wrong in his conclusion, but not due to improper application of the two-tailed test.