Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Which browser are you using?

  • Opera

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • iCab

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • OmniWeb

    Votes: 2 6.5%
  • Internet Explorer

    Votes: 13 41.9%
  • Netscape 4.X

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Netscape 6

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Netscape 7 (public beta)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mozilla

    Votes: 14 45.2%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 6.5%

  • Total voters
    31
Omniweb!

It renders every page I actually use perfectly, has the best UI/prefs/attention to details, and starts up quicker than gecko based browsers. When 5 comes out it'll have the standards compliance and speed of moz/chimera, the startup time of OW4.1/IE, the appearance and usability of OW4.1, and tabs. This assumes that Omnigroup does it right, but given their previous products I have a good deal of confidence that they will. Here's why I think it's going to be so great:

Speed: Gecko shouldn't be faster than a native browser. The fact that it is shows that native browsers (all of them) have crappy rendering. Something designed for complete cross-platform compatibility and modularity shouldn't be fast. When Omnigroup rewrites the OW renderer so that it uses specialized classes instead of misusing Cocoa ones it should be *very* fast (if, of course, they do it right).

Standards: They're rewriting the whole rendering engine with the goals of speed and standards compliance. If they take the time to do it right (which it sounds like they are, release date is in 2003) nothing is stopping them from making it as compliant as Mozilla.

Startup time: it's already good, the changes they're making should only make it smaller since the new classes are more specialized then the old.

Usability: It already rocks, I don't think they'll break it (especially since they aren't focusing on changing that part of it).

Tabs: They've already said they'll put them in, just not exactly how. They don't really like the current form (Moz, Chimera, NS7, Opera, etc...).

OW4.1 has about as many ups and downs as the rest of the browsers out their, as far as I can tell, OW 5 is going to fix ALL of OW's current downs.
 
Aqua-lookin' Mozilla

Originally posted by King Cobra
Now if only Mozilla made all the buttons and s!!t look more like the Aqua theme of OS X, as OmniWeb does, while maintaining its speed and it's current features, I would NEVER change browsers again (well, maybe).
Try
Pinstripe.
toolbar.gif


or Navzilla
 

Attachments

  • navzilla1.1.png
    navzilla1.1.png
    23.2 KB · Views: 95
Re: Omniweb!

Originally posted by Catfish_Man
Speed: Gecko shouldn't be faster than a native browser. The fact that it is shows that native browsers (all of them) have crappy rendering. Something designed for complete cross-platform compatibility and modularity shouldn't be fast. When Omnigroup rewrites the OW renderer so that it uses specialized classes instead of misusing Cocoa ones it should be *very* fast (if, of course, they do it right).

OW4.1 has about as many ups and downs as the rest of the browsers out their, as far as I can tell, OW 5 is going to fix ALL of OW's current downs.
I agree with all of what you said. I believe that when OW 5 comes out I will use it and pay for it. I think the OmniGroup writes fantastic software. They can definitely make OW the fastest, best browser for OS X.

For me, though, today, it's not.

Chris
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.