Apple would almost certainly like to increase its iPhone sales in China. What do you think is the most realistic way for this to happen?
Apple would almost certainly like to increase its iPhone sales in China. What do you think is the most realistic way for this to happen?
Apple would almost certainly like to increase its iPhone sales in China. What do you think is the most realistic way for this to happen?
Who cares.
China has had an overall negative impact on most consumer products. iPhones are so big and there are so many varieties of them (two things totally contradictory to Steve jobs ethos) now because of the Chinese consumer, who are known to be fickle. Everyone who chases money and sells their soul chasing the china market always loses in the long run. Once you sell your soul it's hard to comeback.
Nobody cares about specs. China is the king of knock-offs for a reason. The Chinese love big phones and low prices. That's it.Offer higher specs at competitive prices but they are never going to do that in a month of Sunday’s.
Offer higher specs at competitive prices but they are never going to do that in a month of Sunday’s.
What do you mean by "iPhone sales"?Apple would almost certainly like to increase its iPhone sales in China. What do you think is the most realistic way for this to happen?
More than 20% of the worlds population live in mainland China so it’s a significant market to have a share of. It’s not a country any serious global company chooses to ignore and it’s why so many of our products come from there, including the iPhone.
Correct answer.
It's the same reason why Huawei and Samsung put more RAM in the Asia market versions of their phones. Asian consumers compare specs first.
Look at why the Mate 20 Pro sells so well. It gives you 6.4" OLED, Face ID, and 3 rear cameras for the price of the iPhone XR. Unlike the U.S. market, Chinese consumers don't care about Steve Jobs and Apple's history. They care about specs and value.
Plenty of companies ignore china. The problem is when the board and shareholders are a strong contingent they will wave the "fiduciary responsibility" to increase profits at all costs flag.
When that happens that's when companies goto ****. They could literally slap an apple logo on a plastic straw and if they could do it at a profit they would do it.
It's happened to so many American and European companies over the last 10 years or so. Everywhere you look consumer products have gone to crap in the chase for Chinese market share which by definition means making a cheaper, lower quality and higher branded product.
It takes a company with a strong leader with a clear vision for not only the product but the long term health of the company. Steve jobs was absolutely that person. I think he knew what mix made a good product and went with it. He made mistakes but got so much right. Either way you had a clear vision.
Right now we just don't have that at Apple. They will do literally anything to make sales in china and have a really quixotic iPhone lineup right now that goes 100% against what Steve jobs vision was. I was always a pc person growing up but it was jobs clear dogged vision which was correct that wig me and millions over. We don't have that so you are essentially just resting on your laurels in the us and gunning for new sales in china.
Terrible strategy.
So my original statement stands. Who cares about china. But we have to wait for new leadership at Apple before that will happen.
I wish more consumers did that. It would make competition greater and cause Apple to be more aggressive in its offerings.
It seems like you’re someone living in the 1980s and completely unfamiliar with current economics.
As an example, in 2017, Mercedes-Benz sold:
Look at any other global luxury brand, whether it’s Range Rover or Bottega or Cartier and you’ll find a similar 2:1 or 3:1 sales ratio. Chinese consumers are willing to pay higher prices for better quality products, period.
- 375k vehicles in U.S.
- 610k vehicles in China
[doublepost=1548905182][/doublepost]
It’s a matter of time before that happens but it’s inevitable. Apple has significant mindshare (rightfully) as the creator of the modern touchscreen smartphone. But Gen X and Y consumers will move up the population pyramid and get replaced by Gen Z. That group didn’t grow up seeing Apple as a groundbreaker and are much more willing to try global smartphone brands as they view smartphone purchases as a commodity.
It seems like you’re someone living in the 1980s and completely unfamiliar with current economics.
As an example, in 2017, Mercedes-Benz sold:
Look at any other global luxury brand, whether it’s Range Rover or Bottega or Cartier and you’ll find a similar 2:1 or 3:1 sales ratio. Chinese consumers are willing to pay higher prices for better quality products, period.
- 375k vehicles in U.S.
- 610k vehicles in China
[doublepost=1548905182][/doublepost]
It’s a matter of time before that happens but it’s inevitable. Apple has significant mindshare (rightfully) as the creator of the modern touchscreen smartphone. But Gen X and Y consumers will move up the population pyramid and get replaced by Gen Z. That group didn’t grow up seeing Apple as a groundbreaker and are much more willing to try global smartphone brands as they view smartphone purchases as a commodity.
And are you going to be as foolish as to claim that the Mercedes of today is of a higher quality then that of 10 or 20 years ago? The cla and gla alone are farces that are sold on one thing alone, the badge.
Thank you for proving all my points.
Mercedes has made an inferior product in the hunt for sales in china. Luckily Mercedes is smart and continues to make high quality products along side the cheaper made for china products.
When you look at say e or s class sales in the USA and Europe then the numbers are clearly with us. Do you think the Chinese market minded cla or the us/Eu minded s class is the superior product?
But many companies such as Apple haven't been as smart.
MB sells the majority of the S-class products in China.
From MB press release: “The Mercedes-Maybach S-Class Saloon, which stands for ultimate exclusivity and quality, is very successful. More than 25,000 units have been delivered since its market launch in early 2015, and more than two thirds of those cars went to customers in China.”
The rest of your post is just pure garbage not worth responding to. The GLA and CLA products were meant for Europe and USA and were introduced in those markets first.
The maybach s class is not the same as the s class. Sales figures between the two are not remotely close.
The analogy is you conflating the c63 black series and the regular c63. But maybee to you they are the same I don't know your level of car knowledge.
But you really need to brush up on your facts before starting an argument.
Full disclosure. The auto industry is my industry and I work for a very large car company headquartered in Germany and these sales figures are a major part of my work. I am intimately familiar with s class sales in the USA vs Europe vs Middle East vs China for example.
Try sniffing up another tree.
Or continue trying to win an e-argument and make yourself look dumber then you already do. either option works for me, you are wrong either way.
apple lost that status symbol in china, plus nationalism as someone mentioned above due to the current trade war. and their incremental improvements on every release, the speed of the processor is amazing on iphone but 90 percent of chinese only uses weichat or alipay, so if the app is just as fast on a a cheaper android, why would they splurge on the more expensive iphone.
I wish more consumers did that. It would make competition greater and cause Apple to be more aggressive in its offerings.