I read in a thread here that for the fastest performance, you should have 8 identical ram sticks, and the second choice is to have 4.
My Mac Pro is coming with two sticks (1GB each) and I ordered another four (2 gb each) for a total of 10 gigs of ram.
Am I really going to take a performance hit here? Would I be better off pulling the two 1 GB sticks and just having 8 GB of ram instead of 10 GB?![]()
You will get a performance hit of around 10% or so.
I'm going to quote Barefeats:
"I tested the 10GB scenario... With that config I get the same fast memory fill rates in Xbench as I did with just the four 2GB FB-DIMMs (two on each riser, slots 1+2). "
Why are people implying crazy things like "using the extra RAM will give you a 10% speed hit"? I am constantly amazed at some of what I read on here.
Even barefeats, who started this entire uproar about the performance penalty, EXPLICITLY said he found no performance difference using 10 GB (as the OP asked about) compared to 8 GB.
People need to get real about what the ACTUAL, not theoretical, bottlenecks to typical computing are. The discussion about RAM configurations looks at memory speed tests only, but unless you are a very small minority (running a render farm, etc) this is rarely YOUR bottleneck. Far more likely is a lack of total memory and caching to the HD, which is a HUGE speed hit to computing.