Some other ideas:
My suggestion is not to show the scanner. It's just a very basic scanner, which doesn't reflect "gold standard".
As the old saying goes, you don't sell the steak, you sell the sizzle.
You're showing them the steak, and it's not Grade A.
you're right in saying not to show that scanner......it's not an image that suggests "high quality"
Okay, so I honestly think this is a step in the right direction. Bold, catches your eye with the blue glow, only problem is that it clashes with the gold text. But it has some depth, makes you think about it for a second until you realize it's supposed to be a scanner. I would roll with that, take it a bit further.
The two squares would be for the favicon, social media.
Okay, so I honestly think this is a step in the right direction. Bold, catches your eye with the blue glow, only problem is that it clashes with the gold text. But it has some depth, makes you think about it for a second until you realize it's supposed to be a scanner. I would roll with that, take it a bit further.
The actual font though makes me think of JG WENTWORTH 877 CASH NOW! (877 cash now)....... which is not good.
Not keen on the 'The Gold (S/s)tandard in Photo, Document Scanning' tagline.
At the risk of offending you, which I am not intending to do, all of your logos are in need of significant improvement. A company that's the "gold" or "diamond" standard would hire a skilled designer. Centering is seldom a good design solution, and the typography choices you've made look amateurish. The tag line isn't adding much to your idea; with a company name that includes "digital archiving," it's obvious what the business does, and you telling me it's the gold/diamond standard isn't proving anything to me. Also, while the term "gold standard" has a definition, "diamond standard" is a meaningless term.I agree on the gold standard.
At the risk of offending you, which I am not intending to do, all of your logos are in need of significant improvement. A company that's the "gold" or "diamond" standard would hire a skilled designer. Centering is seldom a good design solution, and the typography choices you've made look amateurish. The tag line isn't adding much to your idea; with a company name that includes "digital archiving," it's obvious what the business does, and you telling me it's the gold/diamond standard isn't proving anything to me. Also, while the term "gold standard" has a definition, "diamond standard" is a meaningless term.
Hire someone. Really.
If you want to do it on the cheap even if you just find someone who's still studying design looking to earn a bit of cash.
I agree with above. None of these are close to a professional logo.
I agree with the statements above.