c. Give it to Billy Mays
Anyways, I thought that Apple used a strong type of glass. It shouldn't break too easily.
c. Give it to Billy Mays
Glass = no. Why? Because it looks like the iPhone. Chrome = no. Why? Because it is old and it is very much prone to scratches. Aluminum = Yes! Why? Because it's not the other two choices.
Besides, I like the nice curve they got on the back. Glass wouldn't have a curve. Aluminum would.
I personally hate the chrome. I never touched the back of my iPod touch when i had it, it went from the packaging to the hard-case i got for it the second i got it home.
What's the point them? You put it in a case to keep the back clean, but since you never look at it, it's useless...
Gold with the home button made of diamonds!![]()
Why would you be paranoid about it? It's helicopter glass for crying out loud? It's scratchproof. Nothing is going to happen to it unless you
a. Shoot it
b. Whack it with a sledgehammer
c. Give it to Billy Mays
I can assure you if it's the same glass as the iPhone 4 it is certainly not scratchproof. I baby mine and I have a small scratch already.
Maybe Apple lied about the glass. Maybe it is more resistant than before, but not enough to handle the hardness of some random items.
Apple boasts about its great designs and how it pays attention to details. But the Ipod chrome back is not a good design. It looks great for the first hour and then is easily damaged. There is nothing elegant or functional about that. A better design is long overdue.
Yes, definitely looks like people want anything but the chrome.