Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Today I have been playing with DeepSeek R1. Installed it locally to my MBP 2014 with an eGPU. The machine is pretty much empty but I made a new user and installed DS to him. I installed the DS R1 7b -model which is the basic recommended and about 4.7GB in size.

I also installed a firewall to see what traffic is there between the local DS and external world. Well, there was no unusual traffic out of the machine to network, at least anything I could see in the firewall. In any case I turned the wi-fi off and run it offline.

I also installed Docker and WebUi. This gives DS the normal appearance we are used to when using Ai. But, I think this way slows it down vs. just using the Terminal. The output starts almost immediately in Terminal but takes minutes using the browser+docker+WebUi -combo.

I would not install this in any computer I have any important data on but run like this in offline environment its quite an interesting experiment. :cool:

But, anyways - this is somewhat usable (not professionally really) even with an early Intel MBP. More powerful eGPU would probably help though.

Ps. it can also hallucinate quite nicely. I asked something about history of our capital and it invents people, dates and things that never happened quite fluently! 😂 There were some details that were more or less correct however so it was not 100% BS.

View attachment 2477624
I've been playing with this on my M1 air (16 GB) for a few days and it's a lot of fun. I'm running it in terminal through Ollama and I'm impressed by the speed. The quality of the output, not so much. This model hallucinates like crazy, and for me it goes haywire the longer I try to work with it before resetting.

I had no idea it works so well on an early Intel machine! I have an old 2014 Mac mini collecting dust, so I might try to see how well it works on that old clunker.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ToniCH
I had no idea it works so well on an early Intel machine! I have an old 2014 Mac mini collecting dust, so I might try to see how well it works on that old clunker.
I added to my original post the realization that Ollama supports only very few AMD GPU's and RX580 is not one of them. So when I thought it was using my eGPU I was wrong. I was completely running on CPU only. However, it was not that bad, like I wrote.

This model hallucinates like crazy,
Yeah, it's a bit annoying. I notice it more and more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uller6
After much effort and many different distros, I finally got Linux onto the 17" 2007 Al Macbook Pro. Better yet, it was MX that I succeeded with. Fundamentally, it took nomodeset and a great deal of time in terms of waiting for it to work, like 15 minutes to reach the live desktop. Once to that point, install was pretty uneventful. This machine will stay on MX, it runs it well in 6GB.

Next task: investigate running Ventura in 4GB on the 2011 MBA...
 
Another thing about the 2007 17-inch MBP is that damned ExpressCard slot. I have a single-port Targus USB3 card. OS X didn't want to know. There are, apparently, a whole raft of workarounds. Meh. With the machine running Linux, It Just Works...
 
  • Like
Reactions: eyoungren
After much effort and many different distros, I finally got Linux onto the 17" 2007 Al Macbook Pro. Better yet, it was MX that I succeeded with. Fundamentally, it took nomodeset and a great deal of time in terms of waiting for it to work, like 15 minutes to reach the live desktop. Once to that point, install was pretty uneventful. This machine will stay on MX, it runs it well in 6GB.

Next task: investigate running Ventura in 4GB on the 2011 MBA...

I did try running Ventura on 4GB MacBook Pro 2009 15 inch. It isn't that bad for light tasks, but it will definitely struggle if you open more than 3 tabs on Safaris. I managed to use it for a day for studying my exam, reading PDF, watching some lectures and have Microsoft Word opened, it is doable. But the lag when switching between program is very visible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DCBassman
I did try running Ventura on 4GB MacBook Pro 2009 15 inch. It isn't that bad for light tasks, but it will definitely struggle if you open more than 3 tabs on Safaris. I managed to use it for a day for studying my exam, reading PDF, watching some lectures and have Microsoft Word opened, it is doable. But the lag when switching between program is very visible.
Thanks for that. I tried it, but it refuses to complete the install, so vack to Monterey it is!
 
lately, well these past 2 weeks,
I finally finished reformatting and sized 2,342 facial profile photos
for a national medical company (only 12 errors, names spelling)
using that early intel macbook air 2010 and CS4

the process was better on that MBA since the the work itself did not need a fast chip,
memory and storage was on a usb a drive they provided.

i need now an early intelligence beer!
 
I started shopping out prices for those re-balling jigs you see in dosdude1 clips and am starting to wonder whether I’m going to, foolishly, level up to buying a board pre-heating station and mountable heat gun, with intent to just start swapping out BGA CPUs, PCHs, and GPUs on early Intel Macs which are either faulty (or which can be bumped up to something even nicer).
When I first saw this post, I was skeptical as to how feasible it would be to perform this kind of rework without a full lab with well-characterized tools and magnification. Hopefully my weekend's project serves to provide some inspiration for the scrappier among us.

Over the holidays, I was given an 13" A1466 MacBook Air, which was suffering a little with a dead battery, the base 4GB of RAM, and what looked like the remnants of a coffee spill. After a quick look elsewhere on these forums and then on Aliexpress, I picked up a $24 set of four Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCG 32Gb chips with the intent of upgrading this A1466 to the maximum 16GB of RAM, as @dosdude1 has done before and documented well.

I also picked up an 8208 hand-held hot air gun that purports to have temperature control as an upgrade over my discount Harbor Freight paint stripper that I've mainly used for heatshrink since I'm not brave enough to point it at anything more expensive. Once I had this hot air gun in hand, though, it occurred to me that I could probably pull off a RAM swap using my home lab rather than borrowing a more professional setup like I did in my previous attempt at a RAM upgrade.

I wound up using one of those cheap 60W USB Type-C PD hotplates as a board pre-heater, which was only feasible because this A1466's 820-3437-B logic board is completely flat underneath the RAM chips. Combining that hot plate (eventually set to 200ºC, but its thermocouple is only loosely attached to its heating element) with the hot air from above (set to 350ºC), I was able to pick the chips off with a very finely-pointed pair of tweezers.
IMG_0378.JPG


Unfortunately, I was a little too impatient with the first RAM chip I removed, gouging the board with my tweezers and tearing a few of the no-connect (N/C) pads off the board. This is a mechanical shame but thankfully not an electrical problem. I was more careful with the other three and extracted them without any issue.

IMG_0380.jpg


In dosdude1 style, I tinned the pads with leaded solder and then used solder wick to get the pads flat enough to receive the new chips. I was able to do this with no problems using a classic T18-style iron. One hiccup (not pictured) is that the new Samsung chips, despite having four times the memory capacity of their Elpida predecessors, were narrower and so the alignment markings I'd made on the board to mark where the corners had been were not entirely helpful.
I was able to align the new chips by eyeballing the center point and also by comparing against a different A1466's flooded logic board which happened to have Hynix chips in the same package.

Refitting was the reverse of removal, with the hotplate again serving as a preheater and the hot air being applied from above. Thanks to the surface tension of molten solder, the classic "poke the chip and see if it wiggles" test worked out perfectly for all four chips.

IMG_0382.JPG


I reassembled the Mac just enough to boot it to a no-hard-drive-detected flashing question mark and confirm both that I hadn't hopelessly shorted anything and that the RAM was nominally working.

At this point, the SPD data needed to be corrected so that the Mac would know that it now had 16GB of RAM available. Since there's no dedicated SPD EEPROM on the board, this data is stored in the SPI flash that holds the UEFI configuration, specifically in the UEFI section with UUID D357D673-4816-486C-9982-A8F6B7E0F569.
While most people simply desolder the SPI flash chip, I decided to try my luck at reprogramming it in-circuit with a CH341A programmer and some 34AWG fly-wires. This worked out perfectly, and I was able to patch the SPD data as per dosdude1's guidance, using the "old engine" version of UEFITool which allows for patching.

(Apparently sometimes you can't just back-feed power to the board like I'm doing here, but I figured it was easy enough to solder to the SPI flash test points that it wouldn't hurt to give it a try before reflowing the chip off the board.)

IMG_0384.jpg


After booting into a fresh install of Mavericks, the Mac is reading my patched SPD data correctly and detects all 16GB! (the Logitech receiver there is because somebody didn't plug the trackpad/keyboard cable all the way in...)

IMG_0386.jpg


So in conclusion, it's totally possible to do BGA rework at home without any magnification or especially fancy tooling. Probably the most premium soldering equipment in this project was my SMD291 flux, which is admittedly expensive - but good flux (of whatever brand) makes life so much better than trying to work without it.

This is obviously smaller-scale than the CPU/PCH/GPU swaps @B S Magnet was considering in the quoted post, but for anybody contemplating the dive into BGA madness, the barrier to entry is not as steep as it may appear. The difference with that sort of scale is that you'd really want a larger preheater and possibly a larger nozzle on the hot air gun so that the board and chip don't warp due to heat...
One other classic BGA challenge not addressed here is reballing; at the ball sizes used here, it is likely feasible to reball with the naked eye, but newer components get increasingly dense and would definitely push the limits of my vision.

Now to find a battery for this Mac and try not to succumb to the siren song of refurbished stereo microscopes...
 
The other day I spent more hours than I’d care to admit trying to get Windows XP x64 edition up and running on a 2006 MacBook 2,1. Suffice to say it runs just fine, but unfortunately due to manufacturers deleting their old software catalogs, finding the drivers has been way more difficult than I imagined it would be.

I got iGPU and chipset drivers thanks to Dell. I got it to recognize the audio hardware, but I’m pretty sure it’s only the optical output that works.

Ethernet was only piece of hardware that worked out of the box.

Anyway, here’s this lmao.
IMG_1CB6A4C6-F965-4404-8D1E-7249D93699E2.jpegIMG_A7A9D1C1-F241-4872-B00E-887C7C0B3804.jpeg

I might pick it up again this or next week and try to find the rest.
But I thought it would be cool to run on here. XP 64 is really Server 2003 in disguise, and has a lot of benefits. And, it’s a fully 64-but OS, unlike SL and Lion on the same machine, since they default to the 32bit kernel.

There’s no Mac OS on here at all, I just had the incline to play with XP 64 and thought one of the random MacBooks I’ve had on a shelf for years would be a good candidate.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_EB565BCC-7D5E-4C84-8C52-67F93C5C9009.jpeg
    IMG_EB565BCC-7D5E-4C84-8C52-67F93C5C9009.jpeg
    363.4 KB · Views: 33
hello everyone here,
after successfully using the early intel macbook air 2010 for three weeks,
that will rest in a box for a while.
therefore my signature and icon will be updated to M1 stuph.
which is not a negative approach to these great computers and era of the cat
as i don't want to be hypocritical or scorn/offend us early Intel-ers!
thanks!
 
Some time ago I locked the desktop wallpaper (panoramic image spanning multiple monitors) for my Mac Pro. But after 5+ years of slow, over time editing, there are some changes in certain objects. Things either got adjusted, fixed, flattened and/or cropped.

What I have in my latest PSD file is not necessarily what I started with. Additionally, at the beginning I was unfamiliar with smart objects in Photoshop. So now, I'm going back over this stuff and going to be setting my objects up as smart objects. I have all of them in their own separate PSD file (cutouts), but again, things changed over time.

I'm starting with Polgara (as I usually do). Now, I long ago found the painting by Keith Parkinson online and it is the basis of what I now have on my desktop wallpaper. But I made some cutout errors, added in generative fill to fix it and then at some point color corrected the image to better suit me. So, the painting does not look like what I have. It's also, not high enough resolution for me.

So, gotta start over. I have the book, so that means I can scan it at a decent resolution.

2025-02-19 08.16.15.jpg

2006 Mac Mini running Snow Leopard and Photoshop CS2. That's a Canon LIDE scanner (I've had it since like 2004, USB).

2025-02-19 08.21.58.jpg2025-02-19 08.22.08.jpg

And now we have Polgara scanned in at 300dpi.

2025-02-19 08.34.53.jpg

Only problem is…the text is embossed over the bird. But not really a problem as my intent was to grab the parts of the Keith Parkinson image that the text overlays and patch it in.

In the meantime, I discovered something. :D

If you look at the book, you can see the symbols and pattern on Polgara's dress are a lighter shade of blue. But! Parkinson's painting shows them as an even lighter blue!!!! Probably a printing error. Since I went with the painting's colors the first time, I will go with those again. Another patch.

You might also notice that the book cover cuts Polgara's dress off higher than Parkinson's painting. So, that bottom part missing from the book cover (which a scan can't capture) will also have to be added.

Polgara_HiRes.jpeg

When it's all said and done, I will have a better cutout, a hi-res image with color correction and all missing bits fixed and it will be saved as a smart object.

PS. Smart objects mean I can resize the object inside any other PSD file and retain the resolution, even if I scale up. And if I edit the actual image itself, this will reflect to any other PSD that has the image. Two reasons I finally got onboard with smart objects.
 
Early Intel Joys/Woes:
Stripped this machine (2007 MBP 17") and fitted UK keyboard and a working optical drive. Despite much care and iFxit instructions, I managed to trash the keyboard backlight connector socket. Not too worried. Barring that one thing, I now have a fully working machine. I'm running El Capitan with SeaLion for mail and web, and it's moving along nicely.
 
I thought since early Intel Macs have their own forum, they should have their own "what have you done with one today" thread too.
I have found early Intel Macs can have all sorts of uses. (Excluding from 2008+ Mac Pro's which are more powerful than some modern machines). If your early Intel can be patched to run up to Catalina I'd say the possibilities are pretty endless as far as day to day use.
Personally I have found Snow Leopard to be even harder to use today than Leopard on PPC. There is a very small amount of Macs that actually get limited at Snow Leopard so the community is smaller for support I guess.

I'll start the thread with my 2009 Mac Mini. It is a 2009, so it can run up to Catalina if I wanted it to, but I didn't have a use for that. I already have a Mac Pro, and a couple desktop PPC Macs already set up. But I wanted to use it for something.
View attachment 1732085View attachment 1732082
I installed Snow Leopard server on it. I missed the entire SL era because I only had a PPC Mac at the time, and the couple times I have used it I found software to be even more scarce than PPC Leopard.
It runs headless, and it serves a number of purposes for me now. Not just one.
It hosts NetBoot, that I can boot most PPC Macs from, and even some early Intel Macs. Unfortunately I can't get the OS 9 netboot to work, but other than it covers a pretty decent range of Mac OS versions from installers to full installs.
View attachment 1732083
I already have a NAS with TrueNAS and x4 4TB drives on that so I didn't really need an NAS (which is the HP Z400 hiding above if you noticed. same architecture as a 2009 Mac Pro, and a Xeon X5675😉) It also wouldn't have the redundancy if the Mini's single 2TB drive failed. But I thought it would be cool to actually use Time Machine. So, I created a folder and shared it. Now, any PPC Mac running Leopard can back up to the Mini. If the drive fails, I don't really care because anything backed up on there is also on the NAS, and a couple other drives. But you can't really beat the convenience of Time Machine can you?
View attachment 1732084Lastly, I copied over the Music from my NAS and put it in iTunes, and set iTunes to share it. So if I want to play a song on another computer I don't have to go searching for the file on the NAS. Plus having it all stored in two places was a plus (99.9% of this library I ripped from actual CDs to ALAC format. It took awhile).

I don't keep in running 24/7, but it boots up very fast when I need it to.
Nothing much. I have 3minis and two iMacs I setup to duel boot off of internal or external ssd. For fun. Just to see what was involved. It was fun. Apple makes it easy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DCBassman
Ugh. Well, I've been looking for something to do with this MacPro other than web browsing, LOL! :D

It would seem that my scan of Polgara is not high enough resolution. When upscaling, the Moíre pattern also shows up. So, back to using the original painting. Been fooling around with color correction…

This is where the Mac Mini comes in handy, because with Photoshop CS2 I can still use Variations. I have to assume that this is something I did early on at some point, I just do not recall.

It would also seem that at some point I stretched Polgara slightly out of proportion (without catching it).

On the left is my current 1200DPI image with color correction. On the right is the target, for color correction anyway. The outline job on the target is poor and was corrected later on in the desktop layered file. I did not quite achieve my color correction target, so I have to assume I did a few other things I've totally forgotten about. However, I think the new color probably looks better.

Screenshot 2025-02-21 at 13.07.45.jpg

Now on to some sharpening (to bring out some details)…
 
Cutout and color patched. The black a layer behind the cutout so I can see what I've done. You may notice some little white pixels outside the crop in some areas. This was necessary to keep the cutout 'smooth' instead of janky. I'm leaving it like this for the smart object and then, whenever I place it the mask will be shrunk in a bit so those little bits disappear. I don't want to lose any info like I did previously.

Screenshot 2025-02-21 at 16.21.13.jpg

Now, it's high res (1200dpi at around 15" tall), so I'm off to make it a smart object.
 
OK, having stopped grinding my teeth of the 17" G4, back to the 17" Intel machine, the Macbook Pro 3,1 2007.
As with the G4, replaced the optical drive - previously mentioned. One thing that annoyed me was Apple's fussiness about what ExpressCards will or won't work on their machines. A Targus single-port USB3 card was detected but not activated in El Capitan, but was fine in MX Linux. Having looked up which chipset is supported, I got a twin-port USB3 card, and that works fine.
Given the age of this machine, and the comparitive lack of RAM, I keep looking for a lighter Linux, and MX also have a Fluxbox edition. It is indeed very light, after install Neofetch showed just 501MB RAM in use. So that's what I;m currently typing on. Will have to see if I like it as much as MX Xfce.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MBAir2010
Bought a new (pre-owned) A1098 (30" Cinema Display power adapter). It seems, after testing (different things over the course of the day) one of the adapters has died. I was thinking it was the display, but after switching cables to another adapter it turns out it's the power adapter.

That has me thinking…I need to test the two 23" Cinemas I have in the garage. They are out there because I thought they'd died. But if it's their power adapters instead…

We will see in a few days.
 
@DCBassman
After more or less actual browser installation say good bye to RAM & CPU :D. (Any Linux distribution).
I went back to the slightly heavier standard MX. It runs that pretty well. And I've set it up as a daily driver and it copes well, using Firefox and Thunderbird. No matter what machine I'm using, though, from my Android phone to my big Windows box, I never have more than two, three max, browser tabs open. That keeps RAM use low.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snowlover
I went back to the slightly heavier standard MX. It runs that pretty well. And I've set it up as a daily driver and it copes well, using Firefox and Thunderbird. No matter what machine I'm using, though, from my Android phone to my big Windows box, I never have more than two, three max, browser tabs open. That keeps RAM use low.
Have you tried Pop!_OS?

I have it in my Blackbook. Do not use it much but when I do it seems to run quite ok.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DCBassman
Bought a new (pre-owned) A1098 (30" Cinema Display power adapter). It seems, after testing (different things over the course of the day) one of the adapters has died. I was thinking it was the display, but after switching cables to another adapter it turns out it's the power adapter.

That has me thinking…I need to test the two 23" Cinemas I have in the garage. They are out there because I thought they'd died. But if it's their power adapters instead…

We will see in a few days.
And that's that. New power supply slotted in and works perfectly. So well in fact, that it seems to have eliminated a fault in the display where it was showing some slight transparency behind windows. It would seem then that the old brick was on it's way out long before I ever got the monitor.
 
I have, and it's quite good. But I think of it as an OS for big, powerful machines, as that is to some extent what it was developed for.
I would not consider the Blackbook (MacBook 4,1) very big and powerful. Very little cpu power difference to MBP 3,1 (~2.6% at same MHz). It seems to run just fine in light work (surfing the net, youtube etc). Yes, it takes more RAM than the lighter ones but with 4GB I think its quite all right. Didn't you have 6GB?

Mac-Book-2008-Blackbook-Pop-OS.jpg
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.