Wow. GBP 1049 for the base model gives a new meaning to the phrase "a pound of flesh."![]()
Something does not compute. You have never been able to buy any Mac for under $999 US. Why now should this fabless ultraportable retina wonder be sub $1K? The price is fine for early adopters. I'm sure it will come down a bit but some of the prices people are throwing out are ridiculous.
Something does not compute. You have never been able to buy any Mac for under $999 US. Why now should this fabless ultraportable retina wonder be sub $1K? The price is fine for early adopters. I'm sure it will come down a bit but some of the prices people are throwing out are ridiculous.
Uh, he was talking GBP, not USD. The price of the rMB is £874+VAT for £175.
So the price is just £874 since VAT doesn't count. Yes it still has to be payed but it is a tax and not part of the price of the actual computer.
Huh? MBA 11" starts at $899 and Mac Mini starts at $499
Uh, he was talking GBP, not USD. The price of the rMB is £874+VAT for £175.
I realize that. Another poster before me converted to $1049. So I guess I'm confused. If the what if price is the actual price then this thread is completely pointless.
Honestly dude, you need to read better.. GBP 1049 is what the person wrote. That means Great Britain Pounds, not dollars. Nobody converted that figure to USD until I did.
I think the poster wanted his amount to include VAT, so his figure with VAT included would be significantly cheaper.
The confusion was that people said the original price GBP 1049 is high, but then people pointed out that that included VAT, so the price is comparable to the US. The OP wanted his figure to include VAT which is confusing to people in the US because tax is rarely included in the price (since sales (or VAT) tax is different depending where in the US the product is bought).
Did I clear this very confusing thread up?
Honestly dude, you need to read better.. GBP 1049 is what the person wrote. That means Great Britain Pounds, not dollars. Nobody converted that figure to USD until I did.
I think the poster wanted his amount to include VAT, so his figure with VAT included would be significantly cheaper.
The confusion was that people said the original price GBP 1049 is high, but then people pointed out that that included VAT, so the price is comparable to the US. The OP wanted his figure to include VAT which is confusing to people in the US because tax is rarely included in the price (since sales (or VAT) tax is different depending where in the US the product is bought).
Did I clear this very confusing thread up?
Clearly the VAT in the UK is much higher, but you guys have universal healthcare, so that's partially what you're paying for with the higher taxes.