You must do a lot of Web Creation. Most people don't even know those rules (for eye straining).m a y a said:Why do people use small and (or) skinny fonts on a white background on a web page, it is an eye strain.![]()
You must do a lot of Web Creation. Most people don't even know those rules (for eye straining).m a y a said:Why do people use small and (or) skinny fonts on a white background on a web page, it is an eye strain.![]()
m a y a said:Why do people use small and (or) skinny fonts on a white background on a web page, it is an eye strain.![]()
slooksterPSV said:Yellow on black. Its over used.
monkeydo_jb said:This site had my coworkers and I rolling.
Really unique site design. It seems like bands and musicians tend to have surprisingly good
websites.
m a y a said:Why do people use small and (or) skinny fonts on a white background on a web page, it is an eye strain.![]()
slooksterPSV said:What kinds of designs do you like sites to have? I mean pinpoint some features you like websites to have.
slooksterPSV said:Point me to a website that has some of those good features in them.
slooksterPSV said:I need an idea. At school we're making websites and I want one that relaxes the eyes and lets you follow where the focus is. I want it to be entertaining too. Any tips, advice, etc. would be great. Thank you in advance - Post 444.
decksnap said:Because it's better than small fonts on a dark background... much easier on the eyes. It definitely comes back to the balance of design and useability- bigger fonts tend to be uglier and 'clunky' from a design perspective, but are obviously easier to read.
i agree with you totally. BUT... you can tell the difference between "the men and the boys" by the file sizes of those flash sites. flash files can be very small. i've seen entire flash sites less than 50kb. of course that wouldnt include images for a gallery, or other portfolio pieces like videos and animation, but those things are only loaded if needed.m a y a said:Flash sites are good however many flash sites loose the main focus and try to be a hollywood blockbuster movie where there is so much $$$ in the movie and no story and the acting is just plain bad and to compensate for all this they throw in Sfx.
I see flash sites in the same boat, use it if you need it don't crowd the site with all flash with no focus it is a waste of time for those on a slower connection and many people hate the "loading" message.![]()
hey... loosen up manVanilla said:M A Y A : Please don't take offence but I could I possibly ask that you take a little more care with the use of the word "loose"?
It's clear that you actually mean "lose" and I know this comes across as incredibly anal and you are certainly not the only one that has taken to spelling "lose" as "loose" so please don't think I am focusing on yourself because I'm not; your post is simply an example of a widespread and growing misspelling issue that's driving me to distraction!
As a by the by I appreciate and agree with your comments and have certainly taken them on board for my own development projects.
Kind regards
Vanilla
Vanilla said:M A Y A : Please don't take offence but I could I possibly ask that you take a little more care with the use of the word "loose"?
It's clear that you actually mean "lose" and I know this comes across as incredibly anal and you are certainly not the only one that has taken to spelling "lose" as "loose" so please don't think I am focusing on yourself because I'm not; your post is simply an example of a widespread and growing misspelling issue that's driving me to distraction!
As a by the by I appreciate and agree with your comments and have certainly taken them on board for my own development projects.
Kind regards
Vanilla
rozwell said:hey... loosen up man
edit- one that bugs me the most is ' a lot ' when its spelled the wrong way ' alot '
This one bugs the heck out of me too. How come nobody says "alittle?"rozwell said:edit- one that bugs me the most is ' a lot ' when its spelled the wrong way ' alot '
Wow, you can't be serious.Vanilla said:M A Y A : Please don't take offence but I could I possibly ask that you take a little more care with the use of the word "loose"?
It's clear that you actually mean "lose" and I know this comes across as incredibly anal and you are certainly not the only one that has taken to spelling "lose" as "loose" so please don't think I am focusing on yourself because I'm not; your post is simply an example of a widespread and growing misspelling issue that's driving me to distraction!
As a by the by I appreciate and agree with your comments and have certainly taken them on board for my own development projects.
Kind regards
Vanilla