I don't get it
My point was its just not for the masses like smartphones. This product category is just too niche at this moment.I work in VR in 4 hour sessions, with a tethered headset. Time disappears in a properly immersive environment where you're walkin around and interacting with three dimensional subjects. Fatigue is no different to any physical labour.
I can't say whether that will happen in a "floating iPad Apps in space" - the full body experience of VR is part of what makes it a good working environment.
Tethers are irrelevant to work-scenarios. Higher quality visuals, and faster data connection is more important to the proprioceptive fidelity of the experience. Managing the tether is a subconscious activity after an initial few hours.
I'm expecting it to be the Mac moment. A splashy opening with lots of "ooh's" and "ah's", but the Apple II's kept selling WAY more units for almost a decade after. Only when looking back we can see what an enormous impact the paradigm introduced then has had on computing in general. 5 years from now, maybe even 10 years from now, Vision Pro might still be a niche product, living alongside Macs, pc's, iPads, etc. But 40 years from now, those last ones will seem quant, and the vision pro will be seen as the one that changed it all. That's my expectation...Nobody within or outside of Apple knows how this is going to play out. Is the Apple Vision Pro another iPhone moment, as in "that's the device we all wanted the whole time?" Or is it a another 3D TV moment, corporations need to sell new stuff but we aren't always the good little consumers that buy everything and anything new, especially when it means wearing something uncomfortable? I'm expecting the second, but, just like everybody else, I don't have a crystal ball and we'll just have to wait and see. Probably the truth is in the middle, it'll make a big impact in some niche usage areas and with some dedicated home users, but it won't become ubiquitous like the modern smart phone.
To be honest, so were smartphones when the iPhone arrived. The masses had Nokia's and Sony-Eriksson dumb phones back then. Blackberries and Windows Mobile phones were only "popular" in a very niche way.My point was its just not for the masses like smartphones. This product category is just too niche at this moment.
My point was its just not for the masses like smartphones. This product category is just too niche at this moment.
Even when the iphone arrived, it didn’t really hit its stride until the iPhone 3G-S or 4 (or possibly later).To be honest, so were smartphones when the iPhone arrived. The masses had Nokia's and Sony-Eriksson dumb phones back then. Blackberries and Windows Mobile phones were only "popular" in a very niche way.
Absolutely, and as a Gen-1 product the Vision Pro puts a lot of important infrastructure into place. Things like an app store and an OS and developer tools, with Apple levels of quality and support.To be honest, so were smartphones when the iPhone arrived. The masses had Nokia's and Sony-Eriksson dumb phones back then. Blackberries and Windows Mobile phones were only "popular" in a very niche way.
Yes, but those were portable and had similar form factors. You shoved it into your pocket when you didn't need it and was not intrusive as a headset. For this to be viable for the masses, the size of the product would need to be the size of a pair of sunglasses. I just can't picture anyone walking around with this thing strapped to their heads.To be honest, so were smartphones when the iPhone arrived. The masses had Nokia's and Sony-Eriksson dumb phones back then. Blackberries and Windows Mobile phones were only "popular" in a very niche way.
As a developer- I will certainly clone any meaningful simple app and make it free. It will be a race to the bottom with me around!Absolutely, and as a Gen-1 product the Vision Pro puts a lot of important infrastructure into place. Things like an app store and an OS and developer tools, with Apple levels of quality and support.
I think we can expect the first generations of software to be expensive — Apple has made a platform for those with means, not common consumers, and I think the software will be pitched at that, to get decent returns out of small sales.
But I think you have to see the long term. It will take years, possibly quite a few, for the product to become mainstream.
It is a tool to help Apple’s marketing team sell people an item they don’t need. Basically, Apple is exploiting that old saying “a fool and his/her money are soon parted”.I don't get it
I remember being super critical of the iPhone when it first came out, for exactly that reason. I’d had copy and paste in my Symbian and Windows ‘smartphones’ for a few years.Even when the iphone arrived, it didn’t really hit its stride until the iPhone 3G-S or 4 (or possibly later).
The original iphones whilst a cool device had a lot of limitations. The step from 3G to 3G-S (i never had an original as they didn’t ship to australia) was a massive leap in performance. PLus we got stuff like cut and paste!
![]()
It going to be quite a hard sell. That said, we all thought the same about the smartphone and the tablet devices, and now they’re ubiquitous.I don't get it