Audiophiles listening to music on an iPhone? Don't make me laugh![]()
The lightning port is also supporting analogue audio. There is still a DAC built in, as mentioned before, otherwise the built in speakers would not work. The dongle is a mere adaptor from analogue lightning to headphone jack.
Realistically, a dongle for $9 does not have a DAC built in. Also the size seems to small for their MFI chip and a DAC.
I've always wondered, how much does it cost to really be rolling as an audiophile anyway? Despite not necessarily being able to afford it all at once at first, you inevitably will succumb to upgrading to the best pre-amps, the best amps, the best speakers, five different sets of headphones, etc.
You need your 24+bit 192Khz audio tracks (or perhaps DSD 5.6MHz), and so on, forget about iTunes 256kb/s AAC or even regular 16-bit flac cd-encodes, and Spotify, let's not even think about that. Then every year new gear comes out that's improved, it's like never ending.
I doubt there is any major difference based on the fact that Apple has not highlighted it in their keynote and on their website.
If there were any improvements, I think Apple would have projected it as a game changing improvement in audio technology.
There's still an analog plug in the chain, it's just been moved one step away. The adapter is a digital -> analog converter. The components in the adapter used to be inside the phone. That's what they removed, and put into the adapter.
The question is, did they put a similar quality D/A converter in the adapter compared to what was in the phone. Technically, they probably could have used something better since it didn't need to be as small.
Your human ears cannot hear digital. All headphones are analogue, a conversion must happen.
yeah, but if we use 3.5mm then it's like
digital -- analog -- plug (loss) -- your ear
if you use lightning its like
digital -- plug (lossless) -- analog -- your ear
it reduces the noise, I'm not saying there's any 'noticeable' (it all depends on individuals) quality loss, but in theory the second one should be superior
[doublepost=1473886846][/doublepost]
but one difference between analogy and digital is analog is much easier to have noise when passing through a plug.
so using a digital port eliminate one source of noise.
Thanks for sharing this info. Any chance to figure out if it has a DAC?Woooooooo
[doublepost=1473892428][/doublepost]Honestly they don't sound different then using the regular 3.5, also the controls on my headphones still work
So you are saying the physical 3.5mm degrades the audio quality, as in connection wise ? And the lightning port will not have connection issues?
now I understand what you mean.In theory, yes. A pretty worn out connector plus a cheap insert will theoretically introduce noise, therefore degrade signal quality. Since it's analog already, the headphone doesn't have anything to eliminate the noise
i'd be surprised if any of the old iphones was using a DAC that costs more than a few $...The lightning port does not support analogue passthrough, that being the case the 9$ dongle must contain a very, very cheap DAC.
i'd be surprised if any of the old iphones was using a DAC that costs more than a few $...
Up to the iphone 6 the DACs Apple used were generally nothing special but the DACs built into the iPhone 6 and 6s series were generally seen as a big improvement.
Combined cost for onboard audio hardware, NFC controller, accelerometer/gyroscope, barometer and compass come in at $18.
According to techinsights, power managerment and audio cost is about $7.5still doesn't tell us if it's more than a few bucks though.![]()
sadly the only thing i found about it is this (iphone 6s estimate):
yeah, but if we use 3.5mm then it's like
digital -- analog -- plug (loss) -- your ear
if you use lightning its like
digital -- plug (lossless) -- analog -- your ear
it reduces the noise, I'm not saying there's any 'noticeable' (it all depends on individuals) quality loss, but in theory the second one should be superior
In the second one, you've somehow forgotten that there is an analog plug. It's on the female end of the adapter. So it actually looks like this:
digital -- plug (lossless) -- analog -- plug (loss) -- your ear.
The only difference will be the quality of the DAC.
EDIT: AHHHH. I get it now. You're only talking about the lightning earpods. In that case, there is still an interface, it's just not a plug. It's the solder points between the wires coming from the earpod speakers and the output of the DAC.
I doubt the amount of noise introduced in the interface between headphones and a 3.5mm jack is more detectable that the noise introduced at the solder points between the DAC in the lightning earpods and the wires to the speakers in the earpods.
well, there isn't really an 'interface'. it's one wire straight between DAC and 'speaker'.
but for 3.5mm, the wire breaks into two parts with the 3.5mm jack in between.
it's DAC -------- Earpod vs. DAC ---- 3.5mm female - 3.5mm male ---- Earpod
The interface is the solder point. The DAC is a chip with output pins. It's soldered to a board, and then wires are soldered to the board.
The only difference between a jack and a solder point is how much contact there is, and how much metal is exposed. It's essentially the same thing.
No, it's DAC -- solder point -- trace on circuit board -- solder point -- Earpod.
This is a pointless argument though. No human being will be able to tell the difference, everything else being equal.