Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Audiophiles listening to music on an iPhone? Don't make me laugh :D

I've always wondered, how much does it cost to really be rolling as an audiophile anyway? Despite not necessarily being able to afford it all at once at first, you inevitably will succumb to upgrading to the best pre-amps, the best amps, the best speakers, five different sets of headphones, etc.

You need your 24+bit 192Khz audio tracks (or perhaps DSD 5.6MHz), and so on, forget about iTunes 256kb/s AAC or even regular 16-bit flac cd-encodes, and Spotify, let's not even think about that. Then every year new gear comes out that's improved, it's like never ending.
 
The lightning port is also supporting analogue audio. There is still a DAC built in, as mentioned before, otherwise the built in speakers would not work. The dongle is a mere adaptor from analogue lightning to headphone jack.
Realistically, a dongle for $9 does not have a DAC built in. Also the size seems to small for their MFI chip and a DAC.

The lightning port does not support analogue passthrough, that being the case the 9$ dongle must contain a very, very cheap DAC.

If lightning had an audio passthrough why would Apple include a Wolfson WM8533 DAC in the lightning to 30 pin adapter, rather that just pass the audio along?

The only way Apple could introduce analogue passthrough would be to, say quietly introduce a lighting 2 with analogue passthrough, however seeing as the 9$ dongle is compatible with phones going back to iPhone 5, this would be impossible.

Sources:

https://www.chipworks.com/about-chipworks/overview/blog/inside-apple-lightning-30-pin-adapter
http://www.apple.com/shop/product/MMX62AM/A/lightning-to-35-mm-headphone-jack-adapter
 
I've always wondered, how much does it cost to really be rolling as an audiophile anyway? Despite not necessarily being able to afford it all at once at first, you inevitably will succumb to upgrading to the best pre-amps, the best amps, the best speakers, five different sets of headphones, etc.

You need your 24+bit 192Khz audio tracks (or perhaps DSD 5.6MHz), and so on, forget about iTunes 256kb/s AAC or even regular 16-bit flac cd-encodes, and Spotify, let's not even think about that. Then every year new gear comes out that's improved, it's like never ending.

All it takes is a great set of earphones like the Shure SE846. And a great headphone port like that of the iPhone 6.

HD files are fine for audio processing, for personal listening is a moot overkill pushed by marketing and placebo.
 
I doubt there is any major difference based on the fact that Apple has not highlighted it in their keynote and on their website.
If there were any improvements, I think Apple would have projected it as a game changing improvement in audio technology.

They would have "revolutionized the way you listen to music"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Linas7
There's still an analog plug in the chain, it's just been moved one step away. The adapter is a digital -> analog converter. The components in the adapter used to be inside the phone. That's what they removed, and put into the adapter.

The question is, did they put a similar quality D/A converter in the adapter compared to what was in the phone. Technically, they probably could have used something better since it didn't need to be as small.

yeah, but if we use 3.5mm then it's like
digital -- analog -- plug (loss) -- your ear
if you use lightning its like
digital -- plug (lossless) -- analog -- your ear

it reduces the noise, I'm not saying there's any 'noticeable' (it all depends on individuals) quality loss, but in theory the second one should be superior
[doublepost=1473886846][/doublepost]
Your human ears cannot hear digital. All headphones are analogue, a conversion must happen.


but one difference between analogy and digital is analog is much easier to have noise when passing through a plug.

so using a digital port eliminate one source of noise.
 
Woooooooo
[doublepost=1473892428][/doublepost]Honestly they don't sound different then using the regular 3.5, also the controls on my headphones still work
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 178
  • Like
Reactions: lmmmcc
yeah, but if we use 3.5mm then it's like
digital -- analog -- plug (loss) -- your ear
if you use lightning its like
digital -- plug (lossless) -- analog -- your ear

it reduces the noise, I'm not saying there's any 'noticeable' (it all depends on individuals) quality loss, but in theory the second one should be superior
[doublepost=1473886846][/doublepost]


but one difference between analogy and digital is analog is much easier to have noise when passing through a plug.

so using a digital port eliminate one source of noise.

So you are saying the physical 3.5mm degrades the audio quality, as in connection wise ? And the lightning port will not have connection issues?
 
Woooooooo
[doublepost=1473892428][/doublepost]Honestly they don't sound different then using the regular 3.5, also the controls on my headphones still work
Thanks for sharing this info. Any chance to figure out if it has a DAC?
 
So you are saying the physical 3.5mm degrades the audio quality, as in connection wise ? And the lightning port will not have connection issues?

In theory, yes. A pretty worn out connector plus a cheap insert will theoretically introduce noise, therefore degrade signal quality. Since it's analog already, the headphone doesn't have anything to eliminate the noise
 
  • Like
Reactions: MH01
In theory, yes. A pretty worn out connector plus a cheap insert will theoretically introduce noise, therefore degrade signal quality. Since it's analog already, the headphone doesn't have anything to eliminate the noise
now I understand what you mean.
 
The lightning port does not support analogue passthrough, that being the case the 9$ dongle must contain a very, very cheap DAC.
i'd be surprised if any of the old iphones was using a DAC that costs more than a few $...
 
i'd be surprised if any of the old iphones was using a DAC that costs more than a few $...

Up to the iphone 6 the DACs Apple used were generally nothing special but the DACs built into the iPhone 6 and 6s series were generally seen as a big improvement.
 
Up to the iphone 6 the DACs Apple used were generally nothing special but the DACs built into the iPhone 6 and 6s series were generally seen as a big improvement.

still doesn't tell us if it's more than a few bucks though. ;)

sadly the only thing i found about it is this (iphone 6s estimate):
Combined cost for onboard audio hardware, NFC controller, accelerometer/gyroscope, barometer and compass come in at $18.
 
yeah, but if we use 3.5mm then it's like
digital -- analog -- plug (loss) -- your ear
if you use lightning its like
digital -- plug (lossless) -- analog -- your ear

it reduces the noise, I'm not saying there's any 'noticeable' (it all depends on individuals) quality loss, but in theory the second one should be superior

In the second one, you've somehow forgotten that there is an analog plug. It's on the female end of the adapter. So it actually looks like this:

digital -- plug (lossless) -- analog -- plug (loss) -- your ear.

The only difference will be the quality of the DAC.

EDIT: AHHHH. I get it now. You're only talking about the lightning earpods. In that case, there is still an interface, it's just not a plug. It's the solder points between the wires coming from the earpod speakers and the output of the DAC.

I doubt the amount of noise introduced in the interface between headphones and a 3.5mm jack is more detectable that the noise introduced at the solder points between the DAC in the lightning earpods and the wires to the speakers in the earpods.
 
Last edited:
Not really an expert, but I didn't really notice a difference listening to my music via the lightning to 3.5mm converter dongle. Sounded the same with my iPhone 6S headphones.

What I can comment on is that I hate the dongle and the removal of the audio jack. The 3.5mm female end is heavy, and causes the entire set of headphones w/wires to become heavy. I had a flight the other day, and I also noticed that I had gotten so used to the 3.5mm jack, that I tried plugging another set of headphones into my iPhone 7, only to realize it's not there anymore. If I wasn't on an upgrade plan, I would've just kept my old iPhone. Courage at its finest.
 
In the second one, you've somehow forgotten that there is an analog plug. It's on the female end of the adapter. So it actually looks like this:

digital -- plug (lossless) -- analog -- plug (loss) -- your ear.

The only difference will be the quality of the DAC.

EDIT: AHHHH. I get it now. You're only talking about the lightning earpods. In that case, there is still an interface, it's just not a plug. It's the solder points between the wires coming from the earpod speakers and the output of the DAC.

I doubt the amount of noise introduced in the interface between headphones and a 3.5mm jack is more detectable that the noise introduced at the solder points between the DAC in the lightning earpods and the wires to the speakers in the earpods.


well, there isn't really an 'interface'. it's one wire straight between DAC and 'speaker'. but for 3.5mm, the wire breaks into two parts with the 3.5mm jack in between.
it's DAC -------- Earpod vs. DAC ---- 3.5mm female - 3.5mm male ---- Earpod



however, this will only decrease quality in theory. in reality, most people can't differentiate a $50 earphone vs $1500 one... and really serious people won't use iPhone to to serious listening, will they?
 
well, there isn't really an 'interface'. it's one wire straight between DAC and 'speaker'.

The interface is the solder point. The DAC is a chip with output pins. It's soldered to a board, and then wires are soldered to the board.

but for 3.5mm, the wire breaks into two parts with the 3.5mm jack in between.

The only difference between a jack and a solder point is how much contact there is, and how much metal is exposed. It's essentially the same thing.

it's DAC -------- Earpod vs. DAC ---- 3.5mm female - 3.5mm male ---- Earpod

No, it's DAC -- solder point -- trace on circuit board -- solder point -- Earpod.

This is a pointless argument though. No human being will be able to tell the difference, everything else being equal.
 
This issue has been discussed to a great length already but id like to add my 2 cents. I took a computer architecture class last year and we had to l earn about how DAC and ADC work. In general when converting from digital -> analog or digital-> digital we will loose quality. This happens because of the limitations that digital data has.

All digital data is stores as either a 1 or a 0. Analog can represent any range in between these like 0.25 or 0.98 for example. So in general this will always cause some loss of some sort. Will it be noticeable? Probably not because we have already been using DAC on the older iphones and almost every electronic device has to use one in order to produce sound if we are using the 3.5mm jack.
 
The interface is the solder point. The DAC is a chip with output pins. It's soldered to a board, and then wires are soldered to the board.



The only difference between a jack and a solder point is how much contact there is, and how much metal is exposed. It's essentially the same thing.



No, it's DAC -- solder point -- trace on circuit board -- solder point -- Earpod.

This is a pointless argument though. No human being will be able to tell the difference, everything else being equal.


you missed a very important, which is, there will be a DAC chip-circuit board connection regardless we are using lightning, 3.5mm or anything else.
in your original post you said "In that case, there is still an interface, it's just not a plug. It's the solder points between the wires coming from the earpod speakers and the output of the DAC."
but do we need to consider that? no, because that's the same for both digital or analog. so, maybe we should say, 3.5mm analogy has an extra interface?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.