Yeah, I like the TiBook a lot, except it won't fit in my pocket.
Pops, if you don't mind, I'm going to take a page out of your book. You'll see...
When I first saw the iMac 233 I thought that was impressive. I thought it couldn't get much better. At the time, 1999, Mac OS 8.5 loaded super fast on the iMac. And I was happy with just 4Gb of space.
Then I got my iBook, the Firewire one. I thought things couldn't get better than this. A portable computer, faster than my iMac, a bigger Hard Drive, at 10GB, and an LCD screen. Nowadays, I bring the iBook to class and I manage to "wow" several classmates.
Then I found out I was doing a lot of work with music and encoding. I read about AltiVec and how iTunes uses the Velocity Engine. I decided I needed a G4 if I was going to speed up the work I was doing with music (editing, variations of starting/ending points, silence, etc.).
That's where I started looking at PowerMacs. I looked hard and long at a PowerMac Dual Processor G4. But I decided I didn't need DVD-RAM or the extra height of the PowerMac. (Keep in mind that my desk in NJ is basically right beside the roof of the house, so I have very little room for a PowerMac to fit).
So I decided on getting the fastest Cube available. I managed to get my current computer with 128MB of RAM (eventually upgraded to 1GB). I think for a desktop computer this is one of Apple's most incredible inventions.
As for portables, I need something with a G4 engine. If the iBook I had was equiped with a G4 I would be happy. But that's why I look at the Titanium as the best portable.
As for portable devices, no questions asked, the iPod completely kicks the blue heck out of all the other portable devices out there. And now with a clock and calendar the iPod just keeps getting better.
Wow. That was like an essay.
