richard4339 said:So basically, you want the 17' MacBookPro with a 10 inch screen and weighing 4 pounds less?
richard4339 said:So basically, you want the 17' MacBookPro with a 10 inch screen and weighing 4 pounds less?
dondark said:No, I just want a small and potable macbook that i can carry around.
*snip*
CyberB0b said:maybe they will make a really really small one. without a screen. life is random you know 🙂
CyberB0b said:maybe they will make a really really small one. without a screen. life is random you know 🙂
dondark said:damn, what is the point without a screen? Do you mean it can project a 100" virtual screen?
richard4339 said:That sounds more on par. With the heat problems they have with the current MacBooks, I don't know if I'd want to own one thats even smaller.
dondark said:Intel CPU = more portable
dondark said:I expect a ultraportable MacBook.
It may be called MacBook Mini.
Intel CPU = more portable
MacBook will not be complete without a macbook under 13".
with the build-in iSight, an ultraportable macbook will be fascinating and your in-and-out laptop.
Jericho2550 said:what Apple needs to release is a pocket sized device the plugs in to any computer via USB and runs OSX, I know I can do that right now, but you have to have a firewire hard drive, and it has to plug into a mac, but if we can have it so it can connect with a USB into a windows machine, PERFECT, it wouldn't need a processor, it'll makes use of the processor of the computer you're plugging into, is this doable?
richard4339 said:So basically, you want the 17' MacBookPro with a 10 inch screen and weighing 4 pounds less?
Kingsly said:Like this?
disconap said:13 processors but it only boots on Sundays.