Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

natebookpro

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 25, 2008
539
16
Maryland
I dont know if anyone else noticed this, I did a quick search and didn't see anything. I would have to say one of my favorite things about my Aluminum Macbook compared to my old MBP is that the feet keep the laptop high enough off the table. Every MBP I ever had I ended up with some little grain of something scratching the bottom because the feet weren't tall enough. Just thought I would share!
 
<- Is so overprotective of his MacBook he is saddened that the feet get scratched.
 
<- Is so overprotective of his MacBook he is saddened that the feet get scratched.

I have to admit to feeling saddened when I found out the feet weren't as silky smooth as they were when i first got my MacBook.

Ha. Yea I noticed the little wear marks on them, but better them than the aluminum. Or as the British say... Alumineeum.

But you guys don't say Uranum, Sodum, Potassum, Calcum, Strontum, Helum, Lithum, Beryllum, Magnesum, Titanum etc. so why should it be Aluminum? It doesn't make sense :eek:
 
I'm just glad that over 3 years in my iBook still has its feet. The Apple salesman I talked over the purchase with swung his PowerBook out of his bag to show how well it was holding up and he pointed out that the only thing which wasn't perfect about it was that it had lost its feet.
 
I dont know if anyone else noticed this, I did a quick search and didn't see anything. I would have to say one of my favorite things about my Aluminum Macbook compared to my old MBP is that the feet keep the laptop high enough off the table. Every MBP I ever had I ended up with some little grain of something scratching the bottom because the feet weren't tall enough. Just thought I would share!

I'll have to agree with you, but only because you're from MD :rolleyes: lol
 
if we are going to get into the pronunciation debate then I am going to have to step in being a brit:
http://dictionary.reference.com/dic?q=aluminium&search=search

You can see that we just break down the work in slight different ways making it different

Also Sulphur is spelt sulphur not sulfur :rolleyes::D;)

O indeed it is and I can't believe we actually gave in and let the spelling be changed to sulfur! I did a while back change all of the Sulfur (Sulphur) wiki page to from sulfur to Sulphur(the true spelling). I got a few formal warnings.:D
Honestly it is so annoying hearing all the of keynotes when Steve Jobs says Aloomenum:mad: so nice when you finally hear Jonathan Ive:cool:
 
I was sad a week or two ago when my PowerBook finally lost one of its feet somewhere on campus while I was carrying it around; the little bugger nearly made it four years :(
 
We do use pounds and ounces here although the metric system is become more prevalent.
oh alright. I just get tired of all the countries that use grams to measure weight. It doesn't even make sense! A gram is not a measurement of weight. That's like using velocity to measure how fast a car goes around a race track.
 
oh alright. I just get tired of all the countries that use grams to measure weight. It doesn't even make sense! A gram is not a measurement of weight. That's like using velocity to measure how fast a car goes around a race track.
The gram is a unit of mass, as is the pound. The gram can also be a unit of weight, as can the pound. On Earth, for all intents and purposes mass and weight are equivalent.

That's like using velocity to measure how fast a car goes around a race track.
No, it'd be like using mph or m/s (both units of velocity and speed) to measure how fast a car goes around a racetrack, and that's exactly what we do.
 
The gram is a unit of mass, as is the pound. The gram can also be a unit of weight, as can the pound. On Earth, for all intents and purposes mass and weight are equivalent.


No, it'd be like using mph or m/s (both units of velocity and speed) to measure how fast a car goes around a racetrack, and that's exactly what we do.

Just a slight correction right there, if a car did one lap of a race track and you where measuring its velocity it would be 0 so it's not the same. Velocity needs a direction and in this case that direction would have to be in a straight line.

The pound is a measure of mass. Weight is entirely dependent on mass but incorporates the effect of gravity, mass doesn't. While you may say that on earth there is no real need to distinguish between mass and weight, to state that a measure of mass (a gram) can also be a measure of weight (Newton) is very very wrong
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.