What Res is Least Taxing?

Discussion in 'MacBook' started by ipodlover77, Jun 23, 2015.

  1. ipodlover77 macrumors 65816

    ipodlover77

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    #1
    What scaled res is the least taxing? Or is it all the same? Trying to lessen the frame drops as much as possible.
     
  2. Wallabe macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2015
    #2
    The default one. It doesn't have to downscale or upscale anything.
     
  3. Queen6 macrumors 603

    Queen6

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2008
    Location:
    Enjoying Better Things
    #3
    It does on the 12" Retina MacBook, equally the impact is very less these days across the available scaled resolutions. Easiest on the GPU technical would be one resolution down from default 1152 by 720 HIDPI as the display`s native resolution is 2304 by 1440. I run my own Retina MacBook scaled at 1440 by 900 HiDPI, without issue.

    Q-6
     
  4. MyopicPaideia macrumors 68000

    MyopicPaideia

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Location:
    Trollhättan, Sweden
    #4
    Exactly correct. The least taxing is the x2 HiDPI 1152x720, or the "larger text" option in display settings. Everything else that is available as an option in display settings (and those up to around 1680x1050 using third party apps) will be more taxing, but ultimately to a nearly identical degree, and not something that will be readily apparent or even noticeable for the most part. This is because the "off screen" scaling calculations aren't significant enough to make much of a difference. (the super high res calculations aren't actually "drawn", hence the term "off screen." So, unlike what a lot of people here seem to believe, these higher resolutions aren't "pushing" 4K UHD pixels at a scaled resolution of 1920x1200 for example.) It is only when you start actually drawing those higher number of pixels on a larger external display that you start to see proper, noticeable degradation in performance.

    A lot of these are placebo effect it seems like. People expect it to perform less, so they see it.
     
  5. shenan1982 macrumors 68040

    shenan1982

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #5
    Definitely 640x480 256 color LOL... eyes rolling.
     
  6. Laserducky macrumors regular

    Laserducky

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2013
    #6
    Very helpful comment for sure !
     
  7. Alex Meek macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2015
    Location:
    Usa
    #7
    Windowed mode used to be noticeably slower quite a ways back in the day, but for a while now they solved the issues of full-acceleration without having to monopolize the display. It's negligible in pretty much every game I run and I'm a few generations behind hardware-wise.

    Resolution and effects settings will dominate the performance facto
     
  8. xmichaelp macrumors 68000

    xmichaelp

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    #8
    I'm pretty sure it actually is pushing all those pixel in scaled resolutions. Just because the screen scales it down to the lower resolution of the screen doesn't mean the hardware doesn't have to push it.
     

Share This Page