Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Originally posted by sparky76
Better hope 10.7 is cool - I don't think we will have the cool-looking machines by then. The computer should be hidden. No need for a keyboard - voice recognition will be the main input. Also, no need for a screen - every room will have a screen - in the living room it will be a large wall screen which is the TV screen or for movies or for the computer, as required.
Also, the system will play all the iTunes music all over the house - with multiple streams to different rooms.
The Mac will also take care of the mundane tasks such as the heating timer, ordering fuel and home security systems. I would be nice to phone the Mac and tell it to turn the heating on.
Most of this technology is here today. It would just take some visionary at Apple to integrate it into one system.
Here's hoping.

At home there are some development communities that advertise this as part of the house. It's called virtual butler or something and there are screens all in each room of the house where you can tell it to light up the kitchen before you even walk in, tell it to start the coffee maker, tell it to start the shower, etc. It even comes with a handheld device so you can arm and watch your house from anywhere in the country when you are away.
 
Originally posted by sparky76
Better hope 10.7 is cool - I don't think we will have the cool-looking machines by then. The computer should be hidden. No need for a keyboard - voice recognition will be the main input. Also, no need for a screen - every room will have a screen - in the living room it will be a large wall screen which is the TV screen or for movies or for the computer, as required.
A lot of people seem to envision pocket computers doing everything via voice recognition within the next 5 or 10 years, but I really don't think that's likely. If you look at the evolution of computers over the past 20 years, although we've added a lot of friendliness and media-integration features (your computer can now essentially replace your entertainment center if you want), the basics haven't changed--you buy a box and hook it up to a monitor with a keyboard plugged in. The biggest difference is the third step, which is connecting it to the Internet.

We've had voice recognition in the MacOS for years and speech synthesis for even longer, but the fact is most people neither care nor use it.

I'm pretty sure that ten years from now we'll still be using tower-shaped computers with monitors like we have today, we'll still have keyboards and mice, and your gui probably won't look a whole heck of a lot different from the way it does now. Some people will still be using 10.3, and a handful will probably still have OS9.

Pervasive computing might happen (though I don't much care for it), and AI-enabled voice recognition could, but natural language recognition isn't likely to have advanced all that far within a decade, at least according to the most recent article out of MIT that I read.

Oh, and a comment on auto-OS-repairs: If they could be made obsolete, that'd be great, but I still wonder if having each file with a built-in checksum to detect unintentional modifications and/or corruption wouldn't be a bad idea, since bad things happen sometimes even when an installer doesn't do them.
 
Originally posted by revenuee
Thats assuming we see 10.7

OS 9 only got to 9.2 before it went to 10

What if after Panther a major update will be called OS 11?

that's only because of the return of SJ... i think as long as he stays at Apple, we will have MacOS X... or simply as evolution of it... not a complete re-write that would require a whole new version number...

that is unless they reach 10.9.9

than Apple are screwed... hahaha
 
I envisage the day, maybe 15 years from now, when all the components of a computer are solid-state... like holographic HD and whatever... (I can't think!)

that would allow for really thin laptops.

screen technology will also be so advanced by then...

I actually think that OLED panels will be available by 10.7. actually deffo...

if we are stuck with these screens I'll eat my hat
 
iChan

i agree ... X (yes it's 10 i know) will be here a while, i mean Darwin is awesome, the only real difference we may see in future upgrades is a change in the GUI, not much on improving a Unix Kernel.

As far as solid-state computer hardware ... well

Sun discovered an interesting bit of technology ... we discussed it a bit in a different thread ... but here is the link to the actual press release

http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/22353.html ... pretty interesting stuff
 
Sometimes it's easier to see forward by looking back.

Look back 10 years to 1993? (In the Mac world that is - forget Windows, it didn't even stop being a glorified menu sitting on top of DOS until W2K)

Has much really changed about the Mac and its OS in that time?

The metaphors haven't changed. We still point and click, use folders to store files.

It's the peripheral things that have changed most. We've gone from
- BBS's at 2.4Kb to Internet at 1.5Mb
- Floppies to CDRs to USB flash drives
- Scanners to digital cameras
- CDs to ITMS

With them comes new ways of using the computer.

Think about the peripheral things and that will tell you more about changes to the "OS".

That's what Steve did. He's bet his apples on the iLife - and it's a bet that he's winning handsomely on.
 
Originally posted by iChan
that's only because of the return of SJ... i think as long as he stays at Apple, we will have MacOS X... or simply as evolution of it... not a complete re-write that would require a whole new version number...

that is unless they reach 10.9.9

than Apple are screwed... hahaha

Not sure whether joke or not, but generally version numbers not decimals. Can have 10.10.1, 10.11.1, 10.9999999.9999999, &c.
 
-better optimized OS, as in, uses less RAM
-a dedicated application for playing back mp3s with a library (none of that itms, ipod, iphone junk support)
-usb 3.0
-blu-ray
 
I was waiting for the BD burner prices to come down, but I just ordered a Super Multi Blu burner with HD DVD ROM support, because I'm not sure if they will continue to make them anymore (even if it's not the fastest for BD).

And I don't have any HD DVD movies. But some titles have not been converted to BD.

So, HD DVD playback should also be supported. Preferably before 10.7
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.