The article you are referring to was written almost two years ago. Hasn't that improved by now?
As others have pointed out that article is OLD and used a flawed benchtest.
My real world experience with low power SSD's indicate a moderate (1-2 hour) improvement in battery life in MBP's when SSD's replace conventional HD's.
cheers
JohnG
You can't change physics. Under normal usage, you shouldn't really find any increases in battery life using an SSD unless you're loading A LOT of files or have A LOT of files stored on a drive, therefore making the Hard Drive work a lot more, aka, using more power. In that scenario, then an SSD will save you power because you can access all your stuff faster then the SSD will return to an Idle power state.
SSD only has 2 Power States as referred to the article. That still holds true, even for newer SSDs. The total power requirement might be lower, which will help in battery life, but if you were to have a comparison of a HDD and SSD while it tries to seek random files continuously, you'll notice a difference with the SSD using more power.
HDD has a variable power. It starts off from a low idle power state to a maximum power state. Therefore, it won't always be at 2 watts, it could be at 1.1 watts or 1.6 watts or whatnot.
The technology hasn't really change much at all. In fact, the article, despite being 2 years old, still holds truth.
Furthermore, do you know how much power a 1-2 hour improvement in battery life is required to be saved? You're looking at close to 10-15 watts savings on a laptop, which is 100% not possible since even the most power hungry hard drives only use 2.5 watts at 100% load.
You cannot change physics, and most of the time, these "improvements" in battery life is a placebo effect. Am I saying you won't get an improvements, no, you will, but nothing too drastic. A 15 to 30 minute improvement is the best you'll get in a perfect scenario.