Isn't the iPad resolution already HD? And around 2k or so ? So the rumored display would be what 4k?
Isn't the iPad resolution already HD? And around 2k or so ? So the rumored display would be what 4k?
It's really better to think of the resolution in terms of @2x, @3x, assuming the screen size remains the same.
All iPads have a base resolution or 1024 x 768 in a 4:3 aspect ratio configuration (i.e. 1024 / 768 = 4 / 3). Retina devices are @2x, meaning 2048 x 1536. To contrast, "Full HD" is 1920 x 1080 (ratio 16:9) and "2k" is 2560 x 1440 (also 16:9). A @2x iPad could thus display full HD comfortably, but not 2k.
If we consider @3x (which is very likely given https://www.macrumors.com/2014/10/08/ipad-retina-hd-display/), we'd be talking 3072 x 2304. This could fit a 2k movie. However, 4k is 3840 x 2160 (this really is a full HD @2x), and again it would not fit comfortably in a @3x iPad although the pixel count is somewhat similar.
I don't understand why they didn't call it Retina Plus
Marking hype. For screens, consumers are conditioned to be familiar with the terms HD, Full HD.
It would mean we'd need more RAM.![]()