What would you buy?

Discussion in 'Mac mini' started by Fozziebear40, Jul 28, 2017.

  1. Fozziebear40 macrumors regular

    Fozziebear40

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Location:
    Newton-le-Willows, England
    #1
    Same price but with a slightly slower processor but you get a screen and FaceTime camera, better graphics? Why would you buy the Mini?
    Screen Shot 2017-07-28 at 07.58.09.png
    --- Post Merged, Jul 28, 2017 ---
    Aahh mini has a fusion drive. Mmmmmm
     
  2. opeter, Jul 28, 2017
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2017

    opeter macrumors 65816

    opeter

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Location:
    Slovenia, EU
    #2
    The Mini is in terms of CPU (and because of Fusion Drive) faster.

    In terms of graphics, there is no notable difference, both integrated GPUs can use up to 1.5 GB of system RAM.

    Here you have the Geekbench scores:

    iMac

    [​IMG]

    Mac mini

    [​IMG]
     
  3. Boyd01 macrumors 68040

    Boyd01

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Location:
    New Jersey Pine Barrens
    #3
    "Same price" is a bit misleading, you need a screen, cable, keyboard and mouse for the mini and that will cost $200 for even "cheapo" peripherals - quite a bit more if you want good quality. Of course, you might already have these.

    The mini should be about 25% faster according to the specs, see the full info here:

    http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/mac_mini/specs/mac-mini-core-i5-2.8-late-2014-specs.html
    http://www.everymac.com/systems/app...-i5-1.6-21-inch-aluminum-late-2015-specs.html

    But you have not told us anything about how you will use the computer or what your expectations are. How could anyone possibly advise you without knowing that? ;)

    For me, I wouldn't buy either. I have a 4gb base mini that runs 24/7 as an iTunes server. It's perfect for that but way underpowered for anything else. I also have a 16gb 2012 quad 2.6ghz i7 mini server that I use for video and audio editing. I love that machine but it's almost twice as fast as the mini you're considering and more than twice as fast as that iMac. I use demanding software and want fast processors to render big video files. I also have something plugged into every port of my Mini.

    I gave my daughter's family my old base 2012 mini after upgrading it to 16gb and a fast external SSD. They love it for basic home computing stuff. Performance wise, it is probably between the two you are considering. Now I gave this to them because I already had it and it was cheaper for me. It replaced their 10 year old 21.5" iMac that served them well for all those years. If money were no object, I would have bought them an iMac like the one you're considering.
     
  4. Count Blah macrumors 68030

    Count Blah

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    Location:
    US of A
    #4
    Neither. Get a quad core iMac, or nothing at all.
     
  5. Micky Do, Jul 31, 2017
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2017

    Micky Do macrumors 68000

    Micky Do

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2012
    Location:
    An island in the Andaman Sea.
    #5
    Great idea for someone who requires or desires quad core grunt….. But expensive, pointless and stupid for someone who has no such need.

    I would (and did) go for the Mac Mini because it is easily occasionally transportable. Additionally, I prefer a matt screen to glossy, and have no use for a FaceTime camera.

    At present, few times a term I take mine to work, where I use it with an LCD projector in class, but I have no need for the day to day portability of a laptop. When I eventually move on to my home country, as sooner or later I must, the Mac Mini will come with me, and I'll get new peripherals when I get there.
     

Share This Page