If it works as intended, this will be much better than the costly and funky implementation of the Garmin inReach.
Oh yea.. whatever happened with that?..A couple of weeks ago (at most) T-Mobile and Spacex announced that they were rolling out a similar service, with similar limitations. It would work with ANY newer cell phones, including an iPhone. Someone at the rollout asked what phones were supported and whoever is CEO of T-Mobile said any modern cell phone, including iPhones. No real price or availability were announced. I wonder if they wanted to beat Apple to the punch of announcing a service like this.
I saw it live on YouTube, I'm sure its still available.
Free is a interesting term when you look at this subject.I mostly have an issue with this not being a free feature. It's like being charged for fall detection after 2 years.
They die. Pretty straightforward.Wondering what the plan is after two years and someone opts not to pay and finds themselves in a life-or-death situation.
It’s basically a fancy PLB. An InReach does significantly more.If it works as intended, this will be much better than the costly and funky implementation of the Garmin inReach.
Ok.. but free for 2 years is ok though? You do realize that very few people(proportion—wise) will keep paying for this? Maybe I'm wrong, but there aren't that many people that need this enough to pay for it. Granted, they haven't told us how much this will cost, but still. Was it worth all of the investments you mentioned?Free is a interesting term when you look at this subject.
Development
Modern geo sat - $100-$200 million? Hard to tell and I can't find exact figures on quick search. (iridium has 75 birds up there). Starlink is $1.5 million a pop but they said they need 12,000 to complete the grid.
Cost to launch a satellite - millllions.
Maintenance, crews, network - millions per year.
Not really sure how free is supposed to work.
I think it's just a test for them to see how many people will actually use it.Ok.. but free for 2 years is ok though? You do realize that very few people(proportion—wise) will keep paying for this? Maybe I'm wrong, but there aren't that many people that need this enough to pay for it. Granted, they haven't told us how much this will cost, but still. Was it worth all of the investments you mentioned?
I bet it'll be bundled into Apple One.$9.99/month eventually…?
Wonder what the plan is after someone stops paying their cell phone bill and finds themselves in a life-or-death situation.Wondering what the plan is after two years and someone opts not to pay and finds themselves in a life-or-death situation.
The companies that originally launched all these satellites all went bankrupt lol. Excepting Musk's more recent one, of course.Was it worth all of the investments you mentioned?
I guess. I'm not super concerned, but this presentation just seemed off to me for a couple of reasons.I think it's just a test for them to see how many people will actually use it.
They will have enough data by 2024 to decide which way to go.
Heck, as long as Apple doesn't go that way, idcThe companies that originally launched all these satellites all went bankrupt lol. Excepting Musk's more recent one, of course.
Pretty much the same features that Apple announced. Basically its going to use StarLink satellites, but it has to be the new Version 2 that is waiting on Starship to be able to launch satellites that big in the numbers the system would need. So...next year-ish? Not really a lot of details beyond SMS messaging, at least at first, and you need a pretty clear line of sight to the satellite. The phone app will help you point your phone in the right direction.Oh yea.. whatever happened with that?..
Did the mention or hint at whether this will be a paid feature?Pretty much the same features that Apple announced. Basically its going to use StarLink satellites, but it has to be the new Version 2 that is waiting on Starship to be able to launch satellites that big in the numbers the system would need. So...next year-ish? Not really a lot of details beyond SMS messaging, at least at first, and you need a pretty clear line of sight to the satellite. The phone app will help you point your phone in the right direction.
That’s a great whataboutism. Nobody knows how this will pan out. At any rate if a subscription is required I’m sure apple will provide lots of lead time.I’m surprised this isn’t just an included feature on all iPhones. In two years from now there will be stories of people who died in remote situations because their emergency SOS coverage lapsed because Apple wanted to charge extra. It will be in very poor taste for Apple to charge extra for an emergency feature… I don’t believe they’ve ever done this before.
I’m betting signing up or enabling for this feature comes with a lot of legalese.Can you see people purposely getting themselves lost in some remote area just to try out the feature?
And then sue Apple if it doesn’t work fast enough or at all
Of course it's innovative. It's in a regular, mainstream phone that everyone has with them, and requires no subscription (for two years at least). Those other devices you refer to are specialty devices that are purchased specifically for sat communications. I have a $299+ Garmin unit that only works if you pay at least $15 per month when you want to use it. I had to buy a sat device specifically for remote situations. Apple's tech is baked into a common phone. That's a big leap....This technology has been available for years in other devices. Nothing innovative really. Anyone who treks around in isolated areas have been able to buy devices to use for a long, long time.
I don't remember any mention about cost. They are hoping to get multiple services in Europe and Asia so they have world coverage. They didn't mention trying to get other providers in the US to split the cost here, just that any brand of phone-Google, Samsung, Apple etc, would work. Providers that agree to support it have to section off a small subset of (what I am assuming to be) texting bandwidth, because it does end up traveling down and going onto the providers network, so they have to reserve the necessary frequencies.Did the mention or hint at whether this will be a paid feature?
A couple of weeks ago (at most) T-Mobile and Spacex announced that they were rolling out a similar service, with similar limitations. It would work with ANY newer cell phones, including an iPhone. Someone at the rollout asked what phones were supported and whoever is CEO of T-Mobile said any modern cell phone, including iPhones. No real price or availability were announced. I wonder if they wanted to beat Apple to the punch of announcing a service like this.
I saw it live on YouTube, I'm sure its still available.
Because it’s extremely expensive to support something like this. Competing devices cost several hundred dollars and up, and require subscriptions of $10-30 a month. they just got a whole satellite network to devote 85% of their network… that doesn’t come cheap, and once apple sells you the phone, theoretically their income has ended.I’m surprised this isn’t just an included feature on all iPhones. In two years from now there will be stories of people who died in remote situations because their emergency SOS coverage lapsed because Apple wanted to charge extra. It will be in very poor taste for Apple to charge extra for an emergency feature… I don’t believe they’ve ever done this before.
Yes. In generally large dedicated devices, not in a phone. Did you also protest the invention of the smartphone? “iPods and computers have been around for years. Nothing innovative here.”This technology has been available for years in other devices. Nothing innovative really. Anyone who treks around in isolated areas have been able to buy devices to use for a long, long time.
![]()
Personal Locator Beacons: How to Choose | REI Co-op
Learn the difference between a personal locator beacon (PLB) and a satellite messenger, and which emergency signal device might be right for you.www.rei.com
OnStar in GM vehicles did it. Crash notification for 2 years, then 1, and after, an annual subscription.I’m surprised this isn’t just an included feature on all iPhones. In two years from now there will be stories of people who died in remote situations because their emergency SOS coverage lapsed because Apple wanted to charge extra. It will be in very poor taste for Apple to charge extra for an emergency feature… I don’t believe they’ve ever done this before.
Very good points. Satellites need to be replaced and launches are still in the multi-millions of dollars.Because it’s extremely expensive to support something like this. Competing devices cost several hundred dollars and up, and require subscriptions of $10-30 a month. they just got a whole satellite network to devote 85% of their network… that doesn’t come cheap, and once apple sells you the phone, theoretically their income has ended.