Actually, so do I.

Apple is not a company that just assembles parts together and hands it over to customers. Trying to be creative and innovative in their design, and trying to improve the ways to actually implement current existing technology requires resources, and consequently, money. Yes, Apple computers would be cheaper if they just looked at what others were doing and put the mechanical components together, but that's not what I'd expect from Apple.
You can say the same thing when comparing $50, $500, and $5000 watchs, all of which keep accurate time. Sometimes I'll just buy the cheapest option because I don't care. In other instances, I'll pay more if its design was the result of real industrial design effort, which was
LATER assembled in a factory.
Same can be said regarding simple things like forks and knives, wallet designs, bag designs, dress shirts, umbrellas, etc.
You're paying for the time spent by creative minds and engineers to work together to make something
THEY, not YOU, believe is unique and worth paying more money for.

I don't believe HP, Lenovo, etc, do this. They decide on making a laptop out of carbon fibre rather than plastic, they order the material, and just "do" it. They listen to their consumers when they demand "faster" computers, "higher resolution" screens, and "the newest technology".
So you have a choice. You may either buy things from a company that listens to you and gives you what you demand in order to keep your business, or you can buy from the company who doesn't listen to you, but goes out to create something THEY think is cool. You then look at the result of the creativity, and see if you like it. I choose the latter.
I guess I wouldn't respect an actor who asked his audience, "So what type of movies do my fans want to see me in?" I'd rather they be creative, and then see the result of what they produced.