Its 4 processors basically it will improve performance its already available for desktops. I wouldnt worry to much when they do come out expect a hit in battery life and heat so for now dual core is fine even for demanding mobile users.
why on earth do people need a quad-core laptop anyways??? the current macbook pro line is (in my eyes) all of the technology that i will really ever need.
When I bought my first custom build computer in the mid 90's running Windows 95, the guy told me I would never need more than 32mb of RAM. 🙂
Now I am running 4GB. You never know what you will need in the future.
joehahn said:why on earth do people need a quad-core laptop anyways??? the current macbook pro line is (in my eyes) all of the technology that i will really ever need.
*whoever says that X computer is enough for them should be limited, by law, to the computers and programs available at the time they say it for the rest of their life...
I know what quad core is, I'm just curious because I hear they will be releasing a MBP with the quad sometime in the next year.
But as stated above, there will be little support for it, so by the time it comes round to being used properly I would of had good usage out of a duo core.
Clarksfield has Turbo Boost for 2.8~3.2 GHz depending on the model.If a Quad core chip is used, it will likely have to run at a lower clock speed. I'll take two higher speed cores over 4 lower-speed cores any day with today's software.
That may change down the road, but for now the drawbacks outweigh the advantages.